Danielle Storck‐Tonon
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Genetics
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Carlos A. PeresElder Ferreira MoratoMárcio Luiz de OliveiraRicardo José da SilvaFernando Zagury Vaz‐de‐MelloA. MeloThiago J. IzzoMaíra Benchimol
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (23 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (10 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers)
- Cited by
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsInsect ScienceNature and Landscape Conservation
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScience AdvancesOecologia
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited KingdomMexico
In The Last Decade
Danielle Storck‐Tonon
29 papers receiving 304 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 228
- Insect Science 136
- Genetics 111
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 104
- Plant Science 54
Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Storck‐Tonon
This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Storck‐Tonon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Storck‐Tonon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Storck‐Tonon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Storck‐Tonon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Storck‐Tonon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Storck‐Tonon. The network helps show where Danielle Storck‐Tonon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Danielle Storck‐Tonon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Danielle Storck‐Tonon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Danielle Storck‐Tonon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Danielle Storck‐Tonon. Danielle Storck‐Tonon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 44 |
About Danielle Storck‐Tonon
Danielle Storck‐Tonon is a scholar working on Horticulture, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 31 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (23 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (10 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (228 citations), Insect Science (136 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (104 citations). Danielle Storck‐Tonon has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Carlos A. Peres, Elder Ferreira Morato, Márcio Luiz de Oliveira, Ricardo José da Silva, Fernando Zagury Vaz‐de‐Mello, A. Melo, Thiago J. Izzo, Maíra Benchimol, Lisandro Juno Soares Vieira and Alexandre Somavilla. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Science Advances and Oecologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.