Danielle B. Pier

14 papers receiving 465 citations

Peers

Danielle B. Pier
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Infectious Diseases 143
  • Microbiology 48
  • Periodontics 29
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 63
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 60
Replace Ana Isabel Freitas with:
Ana Isabel Freitas Portugal
Yiru Yang China
Yaghoub Ahmadyousefi Iran
Peter Noble United Kingdom
Martin Gagnon Canada
Arja Vuorela Finland
Keith A. Martinez United States
Irena Živković Serbia
Yangming Xiao United States
Thomas O’Brien United Kingdom
Danielle B. Pier relative to Ana Isabel Freitas Portugal Ana Isabel Freitas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Ana Isabel Freitas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle B. Pier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle B. Pier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle B. Pier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle B. Pier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle B. Pier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle B. Pier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle B. Pier. The network helps show where Danielle B. Pier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle B. Pier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle B. Pier Line = papers co-authored together Danielle B. Pier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2004148
2 2007102
3 201450
4 201744
5 201431
6 201023
7 201922
8 201121
9 201615
10 20148
11 20106
12 20251
13 20231
14 20161
15 20230

About Danielle B. Pier

Danielle B. Pier is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Infectious Diseases and Surgery, having authored 15 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (4 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (2 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper), MRI in cancer diagnosis (1 paper) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (143 citations), Microbiology (48 citations), Periodontics (29 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (63 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (60 citations). Danielle B. Pier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Portugal and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Donald A. Goldmann, Gerald B. Pier, Kimberly K. Jefferson, Nuno Cerca, Joana Azeredo, Tomás Maira‐Litrán, Kiran Maski, Réjean M. Guerriero, Jeff L. Waugh and Miya E. Bernson‐Leung. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric Neurology, Frontiers in Pediatrics, Journal of Neuroimaging, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine and European Journal of Medical Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact