Thomas O’Brien

20 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers

Thomas O’Brien
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 36
  • Aging 22
  • Molecular Medicine 53
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 147
  • Clinical Biochemistry 52
Replace C. Bousoño García with:
C. Bousoño García Spain
Peter Noble United Kingdom
Emma Smith United States
Thomas A. Hooven United States
Chih-Yuan Hsu United States
Fen Pan China
Katja Becker Switzerland
Ryan Rampersaud United States
Julian Kelly Australia
A. A. C. Dutton United Kingdom
Thomas O’Brien relative to C. Bousoño García Spain C. Bousoño García's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
C. Bousoño García · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas O’Brien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas O’Brien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas O’Brien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas O’Brien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas O’Brien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas O’Brien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas O’Brien. The network helps show where Thomas O’Brien may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas O’Brien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas O’Brien Line = papers co-authored together Thomas O’Brien links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977153
2 200185
3 201546
4 200535
5 201033
6 201132
7 202231
8 197529
9 197625
10 202221
11 202015
12 201914
13 201914
14 20255
15 20215
16 20002
17
Is There a Way out of This Clinic? An Adult and Community Education Perspective on Methadone and the Absence of Rehabilitation.
20072
18 20232
19 20241
20 20161

About Thomas O’Brien

Thomas O’Brien is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Medicine, Aging and Infectious Diseases, having authored 21 papers that have together received 551 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (4 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (4 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (2 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (2 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (2 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (2 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (2 papers) and Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (36 citations), Aging (22 citations), Molecular Medicine (53 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (147 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (52 citations). Thomas O’Brien has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Charles P. O’Brien, John Paul Brady, Thomas J. Testa, Barbara G. Wells, Martin Welch, John Stelling, Fred C. Tenover, R. Williams, Raymond U. Osarogiagbon and Allen D. Berry. Their work appears in journals such as Open Forum Infectious Diseases, eLife, Frontiers in Microbiology, Infection Genetics and Evolution and BMC Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact