Daniela S. S. Lobo
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- James L. KennedyDavid C. HodginsSílvia S. MartinsHermano TavaresValentim GentilLena C. QuiltyCamila Magalhães SilveiraMartin Zack
- Topics
- Gambling Behavior and Treatments (16 papers)Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (9 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsPsychological Medicine
- Partner nations
- CanadaAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Daniela S. S. Lobo
25 papers receiving 654 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Clinical Psychology 500
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 132
- Psychiatry and Mental health 124
- Cognitive Neuroscience 64
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 64
Countries citing papers authored by Daniela S. S. Lobo
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela S. S. Lobo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela S. S. Lobo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela S. S. Lobo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela S. S. Lobo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela S. S. Lobo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela S. S. Lobo. The network helps show where Daniela S. S. Lobo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniela S. S. Lobo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniela S. S. Lobo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniela S. S. Lobo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniela S. S. Lobo. Daniela S. S. Lobo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 53 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 117 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 48 | |
| 17 | 78 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 93 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Daniela S. S. Lobo
Daniela S. S. Lobo is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Applied Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 687 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (16 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (9 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (500 citations), Applied Psychology (48 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (124 citations). Daniela S. S. Lobo has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include James L. Kennedy, David C. Hodgins, Sílvia S. Martins, Hermano Tavares, Valentim Gentil, Lena C. Quilty, Camila Magalhães Silveira, Martin Zack, R. Michael Bagby and Doris Payer. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Psychological Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.