Daniela Hainz

556 total citations
9 papers, 415 citations indexed

About

Daniela Hainz is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniela Hainz has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 415 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Daniela Hainz's work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (7 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (5 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers). Daniela Hainz is often cited by papers focused on Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (7 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (5 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers). Daniela Hainz collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. Daniela Hainz's co-authors include Sabine Schlitt, Christine M. Freitag, Sven Bölte, Angela Ciaramidaro, Henrik Walter, Fritz Poustka, Bernd Weber, Bruno G. Bara, Michael Sachse and Michael Siniatchkin and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Schizophrenia Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Daniela Hainz

9 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers

Daniela Hainz

CN

PMH

CP

GENET

DEP

Lily Lau United States

Melissa Thye United Kingdom

Alisa R. Zoltowski United States

Jessica L. Kinard United States

Tyler C. Duffield United States

Maria Cristina Porfirio Italy

Sebastián Cukier Argentina

Antoinette Sabatino United States

Anouck Amestoy France

Glenn B. Mannheim United States

Lily Lau United States

Daniela Hainz

300 ×0.9

CN

102 ×0.7

PMH

56 ×0.5

CP

67 ×0.8

GENET

102 ×1.4

DEP

Citations per year, relative to Daniela Hainz Daniela Hainz (= 1×) peers Lily Lau

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Hainz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Hainz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Hainz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Hainz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Hainz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Hainz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Hainz. The network helps show where Daniela Hainz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniela Hainz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniela Hainz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniela Hainz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniela Hainz. Daniela Hainz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Hainz, Daniela, Marcus Krüger, Karl Mehnert, et al.. (2021). Mosaic trisomy 12 diagnosed in a female patient: clinical features, genetic analysis, and review of the literature. World Journal of Pediatrics. 17(4). 438–448. 4 indexed citations

2.

Niederwanger, Christian, Tobias Hell, Daniela Hainz, et al.. (2020). Comparison of pediatric scoring systems for mortality in septic patients and the impact of missing information on their predictive power: a retrospective analysis. PeerJ. 8. e9993–e9993. 19 indexed citations

3.

Ciaramidaro, Angela, Sven Bölte, Sabine Schlitt, et al.. (2017). Transdiagnostic deviant facial recognition for implicit negative emotion in autism and schizophrenia. European Neuropsychopharmacology. 28(2). 264–275. 37 indexed citations

4.

Bölte, Sven, Angela Ciaramidaro, Sabine Schlitt, et al.. (2015). Training-induced plasticity of the social brain in autism spectrum disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 207(2). 149–157. 49 indexed citations

5.

Sachse, Michael, Sabine Schlitt, Daniela Hainz, et al.. (2014). Facial emotion recognition in paranoid schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder. Schizophrenia Research. 159(2-3). 509–514. 38 indexed citations

6.

Radeloff, Daniel, Angela Ciaramidaro, Michael Siniatchkin, et al.. (2014). Structural Alterations of the Social Brain: A Comparison between Schizophrenia and Autism. PLoS ONE. 9(9). e106539–e106539. 56 indexed citations

7.

Ciaramidaro, Angela, Sven Bölte, Sabine Schlitt, et al.. (2014). Schizophrenia and Autism as Contrasting Minds: Neural Evidence for the Hypo-Hyper-Intentionality Hypothesis. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 41(1). 171–179. 111 indexed citations

8.

Sachse, Michael, Sabine Schlitt, Daniela Hainz, et al.. (2012). Executive and Visuo-motor Function in Adolescents and Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 43(5). 1222–1235. 64 indexed citations

9.

Bölte, Sven, Sabine Schlitt, Daniela Hainz, et al.. (2011). A Close Eye on the Eagle-Eyed Visual Acuity Hypothesis of Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 42(5). 726–733. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact