Daniela Gil

708 total citations
82 papers, 431 citations indexed

About

Daniela Gil is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniela Gil has authored 82 papers receiving a total of 431 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 64 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 34 papers in Sensory Systems and 18 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Daniela Gil's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (60 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (34 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (18 papers). Daniela Gil is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (60 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (34 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (18 papers). Daniela Gil collaborates with scholars based in Brazil, Poland and Belgium. Daniela Gil's co-authors include Maria Cecília Martinelli Iório, Marisa Frasson de Azevedo, Liliane Desgualdo Pereira, Michele Vargas Garcia, Ana Maria Martins, Milaine Dominici Sanfins, Piotr H. Skarżyński, Magdalena B. Skarżyńska, Karin Zazo Ortiz and José Ricardo Gurgel Testa and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology and Life.

In The Last Decade

Daniela Gil

70 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniela Gil Brazil	12	304	179	122	80	52	82	431
Christiane Kiese-Himmel Germany	12	224 0.7×	167 0.9×	70 0.6×	166 2.1×	29 0.6×	85	516
Sílvio Antônio Monteiro Marone Brazil	13	254 0.8×	207 1.2×	96 0.8×	67 0.8×	31 0.6×	25	437
Jenny Hooi Yin Loo Singapore	10	267 0.9×	93 0.5×	71 0.6×	77 1.0×	27 0.5×	20	379
Maria Nicastri Italy	12	197 0.6×	76 0.4×	78 0.6×	148 1.9×	14 0.3×	46	483
Matthew Hoyer United States	5	279 0.9×	155 0.9×	212 1.7×	49 0.6×	38 0.7×	6	438
Maria Cecília Martinelli Iório Brazil	16	557 1.8×	319 1.8×	324 2.7×	128 1.6×	95 1.8×	86	725
Linnett Sanchez Australia	11	408 1.3×	321 1.8×	156 1.3×	73 0.9×	124 2.4×	17	657
Ruth Stoeckel United States	12	351 1.2×	89 0.5×	89 0.7×	349 4.4×	35 0.7×	17	663
Lílian Cássia Bórnia Jacob-Corteletti Brazil	11	173 0.6×	165 0.9×	138 1.1×	31 0.4×	24 0.5×	39	326
Nienke C. Homans Netherlands	9	245 0.8×	173 1.0×	164 1.3×	26 0.3×	47 0.9×	18	389

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Gil

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Gil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Gil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Gil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Gil

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Gil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Gil. The network helps show where Daniela Gil may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniela Gil

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniela Gil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniela Gil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniela Gil. Daniela Gil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Pinho, Ricardo Silva, et al.. (2023). Benefits of intervention in the Central Auditory Nervous System in individuals with Neurofibromatosis Type 1. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 172. 111692–111692.

Ganança, Fernando Freitas, et al.. (2023). Speech Perception in Ménière Disease. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology. 27(4). e613–e619. 2 indexed citations

Gil, Daniela, et al.. (2023). Limiar Diferencial de mascaramento e potencial evocado auditivo de tronco encefálico em adultos normo-ouvintes com zumbido. Distúrbios da Comunicação. 35(1). e57675–e57675. 1 indexed citations

Sanfins, Milaine Dominici, et al.. (2023). Temporal Ordering and Auditory Resolution in Individuals with Sensorineural Hearing Loss. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology. 28(1). e122–e128.

Gil, Daniela, et al.. (2023). Auditory training for tinnitus treatment: a scoping review. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 90(1). 101361–101361.

Skarżyńska, Magdalena B., et al.. (2022). Self-Perception of Hearing Difficulties and Quality of Life in Individuals with Hearing Loss. Audiology Research. 12(5). 527–538. 4 indexed citations

Matas, Carla Gentile, et al.. (2022). Central auditory processing in children after traumatic brain injury. Clinics. 77. 100118–100118. 4 indexed citations

Gil, Daniela, et al.. (2021). Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Long-Term Follow-Up of Central Auditory Processing After Auditory Training. Journal of Audiology & Otology. 26(1). 22–30. 7 indexed citations

Gil, Daniela, et al.. (2020). Electroacoustic and electrophysiological auditory assessment in aphasic individuals. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 22(2). 1 indexed citations

10.

Gil, Daniela, et al.. (2020). Scale of Auditory Behaviors in the monitoring of acoustically controled auditory training. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 23(1). 2 indexed citations

11.

Martins, Ana Maria, et al.. (2018). Audiometric evaluation in individuals with mucopolysaccharidosis. Clinics. 73. e523–e523. 13 indexed citations

12.

Gil, Daniela, et al.. (2016). Temporal processing and long-latency auditory evoked potential in stutterers. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 83(2). 142–146. 17 indexed citations

13.

Gil, Daniela. (2015). Fones de inserção: um estudo em indivíduos audiologicamente normais. UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo). 1 indexed citations

14.

Gil, Daniela, et al.. (2015). Benchmarks for the Dichotic Sentence Identification test in Brazilian Portuguese for ear and age. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 81(5). 459–465. 12 indexed citations

15.

Gil, Daniela, et al.. (2014). Effects of auditory training in individuals with high-frequency hearing loss. Clinics. 69(12). 835–840. 9 indexed citations

16.

Gil, Daniela, et al.. (2011). Fones de inserção: um estudo em crianças com e sem perda auditiva. Distúrbios da Comunicação. ISSN 2176-2724. 23(1). 1 indexed citations

17.

Gil, Daniela, et al.. (2011). Transient otoacustic emissions with tone pip in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 77(5). 616–621. 1 indexed citations

18.

Gil, Daniela & Maria Cecília Martinelli Iório. (2010). Formal auditory training in adult hearing aid users. Clinics. 65(2). 165–174. 34 indexed citations

19.

Gil, Daniela, et al.. (2009). Influência do tipo de transdutor na deficiência auditiva de grau profundo. Pró-Fono Revista de Atualização Científica. 21(3). 195–200. 4 indexed citations

20.

Gil, Daniela, et al.. (2008). Formal auditory training in elderly hearing aid users. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 74(6). 919–925. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact