Daniel Wodak

494 total citations
22 papers, 144 citations indexed

About

Daniel Wodak is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Wodak has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 144 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 papers in Philosophy and 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Daniel Wodak's work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers) and Free Will and Agency (7 papers). Daniel Wodak is often cited by papers focused on Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers) and Free Will and Agency (7 papers). Daniel Wodak collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Daniel Wodak's co-authors include Marjorie Rhodes, Sarah‐Jane Leslie, Robin Dembroff, Bart Streumer, David Plunkett, April H. Bailey and Andrei Cimpian and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology General, The Philosophical Review and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Wodak

20 papers receiving 127 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Wodak United States 7 78 55 46 26 19 22 144
Constantine Sandis United Kingdom 9 100 1.3× 62 1.1× 36 0.8× 29 1.1× 22 1.2× 42 173
David Hunter Canada 7 66 0.8× 35 0.6× 63 1.4× 10 0.4× 16 0.8× 39 171
Teresa Marques Spain 9 151 1.9× 55 1.0× 84 1.8× 45 1.7× 27 1.4× 26 208
Frederick Stoutland United States 8 99 1.3× 77 1.4× 71 1.5× 24 0.9× 16 0.8× 19 210
David P. Schweikard Germany 4 60 0.8× 52 0.9× 26 0.6× 49 1.9× 35 1.8× 11 147
Kathleen Stock United Kingdom 7 91 1.2× 82 1.5× 58 1.3× 37 1.4× 5 0.3× 23 182
Benjamin McMyler United States 6 128 1.6× 46 0.8× 25 0.5× 69 2.7× 19 1.0× 13 182
Laura Schroeter Australia 10 188 2.4× 71 1.3× 165 3.6× 23 0.9× 12 0.6× 29 256
Eliot Michaelson United Kingdom 8 114 1.5× 44 0.8× 84 1.8× 68 2.6× 11 0.6× 26 209
Bjørn Torgrim Ramberg Norway 5 155 2.0× 85 1.5× 161 3.5× 21 0.8× 9 0.5× 19 264

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Wodak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Wodak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Wodak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Wodak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Wodak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Wodak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Wodak. The network helps show where Daniel Wodak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Wodak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Wodak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Wodak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Wodak. Daniel Wodak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wodak, Daniel. (2024). What Is the Point of Political Equality?. The Philosophical Review. 133(4). 367–413. 2 indexed citations
2.
Bailey, April H., et al.. (2024). People’s beliefs about pronouns reflect both the language they speak and their ideologies.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 153(5). 1388–1406. 2 indexed citations
3.
Wodak, Daniel. (2024). Which Majority Should Rule?. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 52(2). 177–220. 1 indexed citations
4.
Streumer, Bart & Daniel Wodak. (2023). Do formal objections to the error theory overgeneralize?. Analysis. 83(4). 732–741. 1 indexed citations
5.
Plunkett, David & Daniel Wodak. (2022). Legal positivism and the real definition of law. Jurisprudence. 13(3). 317–348. 1 indexed citations
6.
Wodak, Daniel, et al.. (2022). Title Pending 2463.
7.
Wodak, Daniel. (2021). Of Witches and White Folks*. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 104(3). 587–605. 6 indexed citations
8.
Wodak, Daniel, et al.. (2021). On the (in)significance of Hume’s Law. Philosophical Studies. 179(2). 633–653. 4 indexed citations
9.
10.
Wodak, Daniel. (2019). Redundant Reasons. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 98(2). 266–278. 1 indexed citations
11.
Wodak, Daniel. (2019). An Objectivist's Guide to Subjective Reasons. Res Philosophica. 96(2). 229–244. 11 indexed citations
12.
Wodak, Daniel. (2019). Moral perception, inference, and intuition. Philosophical Studies. 176(6). 1495–1512. 3 indexed citations
13.
Wodak, Daniel. (2019). The Expressive Case against Plurality Rule. Journal of Political Philosophy. 27(3). 363–387. 8 indexed citations
14.
Wodak, Daniel. (2018). What If Well-Being Measurements Are Non-Linear?. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 97(1). 29–45. 8 indexed citations
15.
Wodak, Daniel. (2018). What Does ‘Legal Obligation’ Mean?. Pacific philosophical quarterly. 99(4). 790–816. 5 indexed citations
16.
Dembroff, Robin & Daniel Wodak. (2018). He/She/They/Ze. Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy. 5(20201214). 11 indexed citations
17.
Wodak, Daniel. (2018). Mere formalities: fictional normativity and normative authority. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 49(6). 828–850. 21 indexed citations
18.
Wodak, Daniel. (2017). Can Objectivists Account for Subjective Reasons?. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy. 12(3). 10 indexed citations
19.
Wodak, Daniel. (2016). Why realists must reject normative quietism. Philosophical Studies. 174(11). 2795–2817. 5 indexed citations
20.
Wodak, Daniel, Sarah‐Jane Leslie, & Marjorie Rhodes. (2015). What a Loaded Generalization: Generics and Social Cognition. Philosophy Compass. 10(9). 625–635. 38 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Constantine Sandis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David Hunter Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Teresa Marques Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Frederick Stoutland Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David P. Schweikard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kathleen Stock Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Benjamin McMyler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Laura Schroeter Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eliot Michaelson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bjørn Torgrim Ramberg
Rankless by CCL
2026