Daniel T. Pederick

526 total citations
8 papers, 323 citations indexed

About

Daniel T. Pederick is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel T. Pederick has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 323 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 6 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 2 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Daniel T. Pederick's work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers) and RNA regulation and disease (2 papers). Daniel T. Pederick is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers) and RNA regulation and disease (2 papers). Daniel T. Pederick collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Daniel T. Pederick's co-authors include Liqun Luo, Dominic S. Berns, Laura A. DeNardo, Paul Q. Thomas, Jozef Gécz, Sandra Piltz, Simone Mandelstam, Russell C. Dale, Zhigang He and Raman Kumar and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Neuron.

In The Last Decade

Daniel T. Pederick

8 papers receiving 322 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel T. Pederick Australia	7	201	166	87	43	33	8	323
Margaret Maronski United States	8	205 1.0×	131 0.8×	66 0.8×	27 0.6×	34 1.0×	9	349
Ekim Özkaynak United States	5	136 0.7×	139 0.8×	113 1.3×	63 1.5×	75 2.3×	6	322
Staci D. Sanford United States	6	163 0.8×	120 0.7×	68 0.8×	18 0.4×	44 1.3×	7	327
Portia A. Kunz United States	5	175 0.9×	170 1.0×	81 0.9×	68 1.6×	53 1.6×	7	312
Chae-Seok Lim South Korea	13	318 1.6×	158 1.0×	128 1.5×	67 1.6×	42 1.3×	18	502
Ji‐Yoen Kim United States	9	288 1.4×	153 0.9×	142 1.6×	42 1.0×	38 1.2×	9	508
Nicolas H. Piguel United States	10	143 0.7×	74 0.4×	91 1.0×	34 0.8×	73 2.2×	12	250
Paromita Majumder Brazil	14	379 1.9×	99 0.6×	55 0.6×	30 0.7×	18 0.5×	18	563
Bárbara Oliveira Brazil	11	125 0.6×	57 0.3×	99 1.1×	52 1.2×	28 0.8×	22	358
Eva M. Reinthaler Austria	7	155 0.8×	114 0.7×	100 1.1×	19 0.4×	20 0.6×	7	317

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Pederick

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Pederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Pederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Pederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Pederick

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Pederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Pederick. The network helps show where Daniel T. Pederick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel T. Pederick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel T. Pederick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel T. Pederick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel T. Pederick. Daniel T. Pederick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Pederick, Daniel T., Nicole A. Perry, Huyan Meng, et al.. (2023). Context-dependent requirement of G protein coupling for Latrophilin-2 in target selection of hippocampal axons. eLife. 12. 13 indexed citations

2.

Pederick, Daniel T., Jan H. Lui, Chuanyun Xu, et al.. (2021). Reciprocal repulsions instruct the precise assembly of parallel hippocampal networks. Science. 372(6546). 1068–1073. 42 indexed citations

3.

Pederick, Daniel T. & Liqun Luo. (2021). Teneurins. Current Biology. 31(15). R936–R937. 3 indexed citations

4.

Pederick, Daniel T., et al.. (2018). Expanding the RNA-Guided Endonuclease Toolkit for Mouse Genome Editing. The CRISPR Journal. 1(6). 431–439. 6 indexed citations

5.

Pederick, Daniel T., Kay Richards, Sandra Piltz, et al.. (2018). Abnormal Cell Sorting Underlies the Unique X-Linked Inheritance of PCDH19 Epilepsy. Neuron. 97(1). 59–66.e5. 87 indexed citations

6.

Berns, Dominic S., Laura A. DeNardo, Daniel T. Pederick, & Liqun Luo. (2018). Teneurin-3 controls topographic circuit assembly in the hippocampus. Nature. 554(7692). 328–333. 110 indexed citations

7.

Adikusuma, Fatwa, Daniel T. Pederick, Dale McAninch, James Hughes, & Paul Q. Thomas. (2017). Functional Equivalence of the SOX2 and SOX3 Transcription Factors in the Developing Mouse Brain and Testes. Genetics. 206(3). 1495–1503. 18 indexed citations

8.

Pederick, Daniel T., Claire C. Homan, Emily J. Jaehne, et al.. (2016). Pcdh19 Loss-of-Function Increases Neuronal Migration In Vitro but is Dispensable for Brain Development in Mice. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 26765–26765. 44 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact