Sandra Piltz

1.4k total citations
23 papers, 534 citations indexed

About

Sandra Piltz is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Sandra Piltz has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 534 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Molecular Biology, 13 papers in Genetics and 3 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Sandra Piltz's work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (11 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (5 papers) and RNA regulation and disease (3 papers). Sandra Piltz is often cited by papers focused on CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (11 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (5 papers) and RNA regulation and disease (3 papers). Sandra Piltz collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Malaysia. Sandra Piltz's co-authors include Paul Q. Thomas, Jozef Gécz, Daniel T. Pederick, Fatwa Adikusuma, James N. Hughes, Kay Richards, Steven Petrou, James Hughes, Claire C. Homan and Lachlan A. Jolly and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nucleic Acids Research.

In The Last Decade

Sandra Piltz

19 papers receiving 529 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sandra Piltz Australia 14 390 212 99 62 56 23 534
Nicole E. Hatem United States 4 519 1.3× 330 1.6× 101 1.0× 95 1.5× 168 3.0× 4 820
Kraig M. Theriault United States 5 856 2.2× 351 1.7× 115 1.2× 25 0.4× 35 0.6× 6 1.0k
Zhou Xp China 5 416 1.1× 306 1.4× 47 0.5× 14 0.2× 21 0.4× 8 634
S. Ali M. Shariati United States 9 721 1.8× 92 0.4× 98 1.0× 11 0.2× 109 1.9× 9 893
Christopher W. Whelan United States 8 214 0.5× 78 0.4× 57 0.6× 23 0.4× 75 1.3× 13 504
Sara Bizzotto United States 8 303 0.8× 216 1.0× 46 0.5× 52 0.8× 99 1.8× 11 468
Greger Abrahamsen Norway 10 250 0.6× 55 0.3× 86 0.9× 13 0.2× 54 1.0× 15 551
Andrey Damianov United States 13 1.2k 3.0× 170 0.8× 92 0.9× 10 0.2× 210 3.8× 16 1.3k
Géza Ádám Hungary 11 203 0.5× 36 0.2× 125 1.3× 11 0.2× 41 0.7× 13 438
Antonio Vitobello France 13 446 1.1× 212 1.0× 79 0.8× 14 0.2× 71 1.3× 36 595

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Piltz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Piltz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Piltz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Piltz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Piltz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Piltz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Piltz. The network helps show where Sandra Piltz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra Piltz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra Piltz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra Piltz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra Piltz. Sandra Piltz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Winstanley, Yasmyn E., Alexander P. Sobinoff, Linda Wu, et al.. (2025). Telomere length in offspring is determined by mitochondrial-nuclear communication at fertilization. Nature Communications. 16(1). 2527–2527.
3.
Bunting, Mark D., G.I. Godahewa, Nicole O. McPherson, et al.. (2024). Investigating the potential of X chromosome shredding for mouse genetic biocontrol. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 13466–13466.
4.
Kazenwadel, Jan, Parvathy Venugopal, Anna Oszmiana, et al.. (2023). A Prox1 enhancer represses haematopoiesis in the lymphatic vasculature. Nature. 614(7947). 343–348. 23 indexed citations
5.
Bunting, Mark D., G.I. Godahewa, Sandra Piltz, et al.. (2022). Leveraging a natural murine meiotic drive to suppress invasive populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119(46). e2213308119–e2213308119. 19 indexed citations
6.
Li, Melody, Nikola Jancovski, Paymaan Jafar‐Nejad, et al.. (2022). Antisense oligonucleotide therapy for KCNT1 encephalopathy. JCI Insight. 7(23). 31 indexed citations
7.
Bunting, Mark D., et al.. (2022). Generation of Gene Drive Mice for Invasive Pest Population Suppression. Methods in molecular biology. 2495. 203–230. 5 indexed citations
8.
Adikusuma, Fatwa, et al.. (2021). Optimized nickase- and nuclease-based prime editing in human and mouse cells. Nucleic Acids Research. 49(18). 10785–10795. 62 indexed citations
9.
Adikusuma, Fatwa, et al.. (2021). The Nestin neural enhancer is essential for normal levels of endogenous Nestin in neuroprogenitors but is not required for embryo development. PLoS ONE. 16(11). e0258538–e0258538. 2 indexed citations
10.
White, Melissa, Sandra Piltz, Michaela Scherer, et al.. (2020). Progress Toward Zygotic and Germline Gene Drives in Mice. The CRISPR Journal. 3(5). 388–397. 26 indexed citations
11.
Care, Alison S., Rebecca L. Wilson, Sandra Piltz, et al.. (2020). A sexually dimorphic murine model of IUGR induced by embryo transfer. Reproduction. 161(2). 135–144. 3 indexed citations
12.
Oishi, Sabrina, Oressia Zalucki, Tracey J. Harvey, et al.. (2020). Investigating cortical features of Sotos syndrome using mice heterozygous for Nsd1. Genes Brain & Behavior. 19(4). e12637–e12637. 17 indexed citations
13.
Piltz, Sandra, et al.. (2019). Functional screening of GATOR1 complex variants reveals a role for mTORC1 deregulation in FCD and focal epilepsy. Neurobiology of Disease. 134. 104640–104640. 30 indexed citations
14.
Pederick, Daniel T., et al.. (2018). Expanding the RNA-Guided Endonuclease Toolkit for Mouse Genome Editing. The CRISPR Journal. 1(6). 431–439. 6 indexed citations
15.
Pederick, Daniel T., Kay Richards, Sandra Piltz, et al.. (2018). Abnormal Cell Sorting Underlies the Unique X-Linked Inheritance of PCDH19 Epilepsy. Neuron. 97(1). 59–66.e5. 87 indexed citations
16.
Homan, Claire C., Stephen Pederson, Chuan Tan, et al.. (2018). PCDH19 regulation of neural progenitor cell differentiation suggests asynchrony of neurogenesis as a mechanism contributing to PCDH19 Girls Clustering Epilepsy. Neurobiology of Disease. 116. 106–119. 40 indexed citations
17.
Hughes, James, Melinda N. Tea, Dale McAninch, et al.. (2017). Knockout of the epilepsy gene Depdc5 in mice causes severe embryonic dysmorphology with hyperactivity of mTORC1 signalling. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 12618–12618. 40 indexed citations
18.
Pederick, Daniel T., Claire C. Homan, Emily J. Jaehne, et al.. (2016). Pcdh19 Loss-of-Function Increases Neuronal Migration In Vitro but is Dispensable for Brain Development in Mice. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 26765–26765. 44 indexed citations
19.
Hughes, James, Sandra Piltz, Nicholas Rogers, et al.. (2013). Mechanistic Insight into the Pathology of Polyalanine Expansion Disorders Revealed by a Mouse Model for X Linked Hypopituitarism. PLoS Genetics. 9(3). e1003290–e1003290. 19 indexed citations
20.
Tan, Jacqueline, Michael B. Morris, Karine Rizzoti, et al.. (2012). Congenital Hydrocephalus and Abnormal Subcommissural Organ Development in Sox3 Transgenic Mice. PLoS ONE. 7(1). e29041–e29041. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026