Daniel T. Hogarty

559 total citations
10 papers, 364 citations indexed

About

Daniel T. Hogarty is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel T. Hogarty has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 364 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Ophthalmology, 4 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 3 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Daniel T. Hogarty's work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers). Daniel T. Hogarty is often cited by papers focused on Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers). Daniel T. Hogarty collaborates with scholars based in Australia and Ireland. Daniel T. Hogarty's co-authors include Alex W. Hewitt, David A. Mackey, Fergal J. Moloney, Anousha Yazdabadi, Kevin Phan, Saeid Nahavandi, John Su, Mohammed Hossny, Mohamed Attia and P. Lenane and has published in prestigious journals such as Survey of Ophthalmology, Journal of Clinical Medicine and American Journal of Clinical Dermatology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel T. Hogarty

9 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel T. Hogarty Australia 7 187 155 91 77 50 10 364
David Coz United States 4 189 1.0× 106 0.7× 21 0.2× 47 0.6× 127 2.5× 5 362
Jinsong Zhang China 11 254 1.4× 86 0.6× 54 0.6× 31 0.4× 31 0.6× 25 350
Judith Birkenfeld Spain 14 401 2.1× 290 1.9× 283 3.1× 86 1.1× 76 1.5× 29 621
Sundaram Natarajan India 15 444 2.4× 678 4.4× 45 0.5× 68 0.9× 10 0.2× 69 906
Peter A. Karth United States 12 469 2.5× 473 3.1× 45 0.5× 10 0.1× 68 1.4× 23 716
Jesse M. Smith United States 12 255 1.4× 257 1.7× 62 0.7× 9 0.1× 81 1.6× 31 628
Weng Onn Chan Australia 12 185 1.0× 304 2.0× 113 1.2× 9 0.1× 14 0.3× 58 531
Raffaele Raimondi Italy 10 201 1.1× 273 1.8× 29 0.3× 35 0.5× 12 0.2× 36 401
Zhongwen Li China 11 286 1.5× 246 1.6× 29 0.3× 10 0.1× 28 0.6× 23 341
Karsten Kortuem Germany 14 517 2.8× 569 3.7× 87 1.0× 12 0.2× 27 0.5× 37 687

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Hogarty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Hogarty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Hogarty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Hogarty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Hogarty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Hogarty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Hogarty. The network helps show where Daniel T. Hogarty may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel T. Hogarty

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel T. Hogarty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel T. Hogarty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel T. Hogarty. Daniel T. Hogarty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Rowson, Antonia C., et al.. (2022). Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Safety of Individual Devices. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 11(22). 6833–6833. 13 indexed citations
2.
Jones, Morgan, et al.. (2022). Review article: Early steroid administration for traumatic haemorrhagic shock: A systematic review. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 35(1). 6–13. 2 indexed citations
3.
Hogarty, Daniel T., et al.. (2022). Acute onset ocular myasthenia gravis after vaccination with the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. Orbit. 42(6). 630–634. 14 indexed citations
4.
5.
Hogarty, Daniel T., John Su, Kevin Phan, et al.. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology—Where We Are and the Way to the Future: A Review. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. 21(1). 41–47. 112 indexed citations
6.
Hogarty, Daniel T., et al.. (2019). Smartphone use in ophthalmology: What is their place in clinical practice?. Survey of Ophthalmology. 65(2). 250–262. 44 indexed citations
7.
Phan, Kevin, et al.. (2019). Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and skin cancer risk in nonrenal solid organ transplant recipients: systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Journal of Dermatology. 59(1). 91–98. 7 indexed citations
8.
Hogarty, Daniel T., et al.. (2018). Vismodegib and orbital excision for treating locally advanced basal cell carcinoma. International Medical Case Reports Journal. Volume 11. 177–179. 5 indexed citations
9.
Hogarty, Daniel T., et al.. (2018). Comparing visual acuity, range of vision and spectacle independence in the extended range of vision and monofocal intraocular lens. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 46(8). 854–860. 43 indexed citations
10.
Hogarty, Daniel T., David A. Mackey, & Alex W. Hewitt. (2018). Current state and future prospects of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: a review. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 47(1). 128–139. 124 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026