Daniel T. Dibaba

23 papers receiving 658 citations

Peers

Daniel T. Dibaba
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 206
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 26
  • Nephrology 61
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 121
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 129
Replace Tonya Orchard with:
Tonya Orchard United States
Fangzhen Xia China
Sylwia Płaczkowska Poland
Gemma Marcucci Italy
Zhila Maghbooli Iran
Yun Song China
Maria Cristina Savanelli Italy
Antonia C Hardcastle United Kingdom
Lichen Yang China
Byung-Kook Lee South Korea
Daniel T. Dibaba relative to Tonya Orchard United States Tonya Orchard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Tonya Orchard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Dibaba

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Dibaba's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Dibaba with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Dibaba more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Dibaba

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Dibaba. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Dibaba. The network helps show where Daniel T. Dibaba may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel T. Dibaba, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel T. Dibaba Line = papers co-authored together Daniel T. Dibaba links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019139
2 201677
3 201967
4 201766
5 201455
6 201853
7 201829
8 201828
9 201527
10 202027
11 201924
12 201915
13 201412
14 202111
15 20189
16 20218
17 20198
18 20206
19 20214
20
Reliability Testing of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score in Post-operative Patients.
20224

About Daniel T. Dibaba

Daniel T. Dibaba is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Nephrology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Oncology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 676 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (6 papers), Magnesium in Health and Disease (6 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (5 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (4 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (3 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (2 papers), Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis (2 papers) and Shoulder Injury and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (206 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (26 citations), Nephrology (61 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (121 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (129 citations). Daniel T. Dibaba has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Tomi Akinyemiju, Pengcheng Xun, Ka He, Kemi Ogunsina, Aurelian Bidulescu, Alyce D. Fly, Dejana Braithwaite, Khalid Khan, Heather R. Millard and Michael Shechter. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Nutrition, British Journal of Cancer, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Diabetic Medicine and Journal of Global Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact