Daniel Rigney

549 total citations
12 papers, 304 citations indexed

About

Daniel Rigney is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Rigney has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 304 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 2 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 1 paper in Health. Recurrent topics in Daniel Rigney's work include Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper). Daniel Rigney is often cited by papers focused on Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper). Daniel Rigney collaborates with scholars based in United States. Daniel Rigney's co-authors include Richard A. Hilbert, Thomas J. Hoffman and Richard Machalek and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion and Social Science Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Rigney

11 papers receiving 256 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel Rigney United States	8	126	56	50	30	26	12	304
Walter L. Wallace United States	11	194 1.5×	57 1.0×	34 0.7×	40 1.3×	29 1.1×	32	419
Harry M. Johnson United States	9	165 1.3×	27 0.5×	39 0.8×	55 1.8×	24 0.9×	23	439
Hermínio Martins United Kingdom	9	154 1.2×	34 0.6×	62 1.2×	21 0.7×	11 0.4×	31	362
Eric Hoffer	5	163 1.3×	42 0.8×	73 1.5×	38 1.3×	9 0.3×	9	351
Charles K. Warriner United States	10	121 1.0×	24 0.4×	23 0.5×	37 1.2×	19 0.7×	22	311
Donald N. Michael United States	11	139 1.1×	31 0.6×	23 0.5×	89 3.0×	15 0.6×	30	443
Timothy Hedeen United States	9	125 1.0×	91 1.6×	34 0.7×	21 0.7×	28 1.1×	16	305
Charles J. Sykes	5	128 1.0×	126 2.3×	82 1.6×	41 1.4×	24 0.9×	8	429
Ernst Breisach United States	10	184 1.5×	33 0.6×	66 1.3×	16 0.5×	4 0.2×	14	527
Peter Clarke United States	5	262 2.1×	36 0.6×	38 0.8×	49 1.6×	35 1.3×	11	524

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Rigney

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Rigney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Rigney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Rigney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Rigney

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Rigney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Rigney. The network helps show where Daniel Rigney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Rigney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Rigney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Rigney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Rigney. Daniel Rigney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Rigney, Daniel. (2010). The Matthew Effect: How Advantage Begets Further Advantage. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 122 indexed citations

2.

Rigney, Daniel, et al.. (2004). Is There a Catholic Sharing Ethic?: A Research Note. Sociology of Religion. 65(2). 155–155. 7 indexed citations

3.

Hilbert, Richard A. & Daniel Rigney. (2002). The Metaphorical Society: An Invitation to Social Theory. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 31(4). 492–492. 32 indexed citations

4.

Rigney, Daniel, et al.. (1994). A NATION OF GRAY INDIVIDUALISTS: MORAL RELATIVISM IN THE UNITED STATES. Journal of Social Philosophy. 25(1). 20–45. 4 indexed citations

5.

Rigney, Daniel & Thomas J. Hoffman. (1993). Is American Catholicism Anti-Intellectual?. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 32(3). 211–211. 7 indexed citations

6.

Rigney, Daniel. (1991). Three Kinds of Anti‐Intellectualism: Rethinking Hofstadter*. Sociological Inquiry. 61(4). 434–451. 58 indexed citations

7.

Rigney, Daniel, et al.. (1983). Sociological Theory in Use.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 12(5). 582–582. 18 indexed citations

8.

Rigney, Daniel. (1982). ANALOGIES IN SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY. 10(1). 1 indexed citations

9.

Rigney, Daniel, et al.. (1980). Patterns of Interdisciplinary Citation in the Social Sciences.. Social Science Quarterly. 61(1). 30 indexed citations

10.

Rigney, Daniel, et al.. (1980). World Communication: Threat or Promise?: A Socio-Technical Approach.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 9(1). 97–97. 15 indexed citations

11.

Rigney, Daniel. (1979). Secrecy and social cohesion. Society. 16(4). 52–55. 8 indexed citations

12.

Rigney, Daniel, et al.. (1978). Is Secularization a Discontinuous Process?. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 17(4). 381–381. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact