Daniel Redhead

21 papers receiving 371 citations

Peers

Daniel Redhead
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 121
  • Safety Research 78
  • Sociology and Political Science 249
  • Social Psychology 113
  • Developmental Biology 8
Replace Shakti Lamba with:
Shakti Lamba United Kingdom
Tamás Dávid-Barrett United Kingdom
David Pietraszewski Germany
Nicole Naar United States
Karolina Sylwester United Kingdom
Matthew Zefferman United States
Daisuke Nakanishi Japan
Ryan Baldini United States
Cristina Moya United States
Candace S. Alcorta United States
Daniel Redhead relative to Shakti Lamba United Kingdom Shakti Lamba's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.2×
Shakti Lamba · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Redhead

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Redhead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Redhead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Redhead more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Redhead

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Redhead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Redhead. The network helps show where Daniel Redhead may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Redhead, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Redhead Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Redhead links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201881
2 201970
3 202247
4 202131
5 202129
6 202318
7 202215
8 202314
9 202112
10 202412
11 202311
12 202410
13 202310
14 20236
15 20233
16
Rank Differentiation among Adolescent Hierarchies in Romanian State Care
20162
17 20252
18 20222
19 20251
20 20251

About Daniel Redhead

Daniel Redhead is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (14 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (7 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers), Language and cultural evolution (2 papers) and Complex Network Analysis Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (121 citations), Safety Research (78 citations), Sociology and Political Science (249 citations), Social Psychology (113 citations) and Developmental Biology (8 citations). Daniel Redhead has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christopher von Rueden, Rick O’Gorman, Cody T. Ross, Joey T. Cheng, Eleanor A. Power, Charles Driver, Tom Foulsham, Hillard Kaplan, Michael Gurven and Richard McElreath. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution and Human Behavior, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Journal of Animal Ecology, Psychological Methods and Methodological Innovations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact