Daniel Pinazo

32 papers receiving 533 citations

Peers

Daniel Pinazo
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Communication 50
  • Clinical Psychology 137
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 81
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 110
  • Social Psychology 107
Replace Garth Coombs with:
Garth Coombs United States
Karina Karolina Kedzior Germany
David Abrahamson United States
Manuel M. Ramos‐Álvarez Spain
Wen Jia Chai Malaysia
Zhiliang Yang China
Melissa Daniels United States
Marcele Regine de Carvalho Brazil
Ji‐Won Chun South Korea
Wang‐Youn Won South Korea
Daniel Pinazo relative to Garth Coombs United States Garth Coombs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Garth Coombs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Pinazo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Pinazo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Pinazo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Pinazo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Pinazo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Pinazo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Pinazo. The network helps show where Daniel Pinazo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Pinazo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Pinazo Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Pinazo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016237
2 200283
3 201948
4
"I failed because I got very nervous". Anxiety and performance in interpreter trainees: an empirical study
200125
5 202021
6 201420
7 201319
8 201312
9 20199
10 20198
11 20158
12 20217
13 20217
14 20217
15 20207
16 20136
17 20165
18 20105
19 20224
20
Una aproximación al estudio de las emociones como sistemas dinámicos complejos
20064

About Daniel Pinazo

Daniel Pinazo is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Health Professions, having authored 35 papers that have together received 567 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (9 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (50 citations), Clinical Psychology (137 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (81 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (110 citations) and Social Psychology (107 citations). Daniel Pinazo has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Germany and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Alfonso Barrós‐Loscertales, César Ávila, Martin Walter, Viola Borchardt, Noelia Ventura‐Campos, Aina Rodríguez‐Pujadas, Juan Carlos Bustamante, Paola Fuentes‐Claramonte, Generós Ortet and Manuel I. Ibáñez. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics, Scientific Reports, Comunicar and The Journal of Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact