Daniel Perkins

39 papers receiving 740 citations

Peers

Daniel Perkins
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Biological Psychiatry 79
  • Clinical Psychology 598
  • Toxicology 50
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 242
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 171
Replace Kim van Oorsouw with:
Kim van Oorsouw Netherlands
Malin V. Uthaug Netherlands
Johannes T. Reckweg Netherlands
Teri Suzanne Krebs Norway
Rafael Lancelotta United States
Adèle Lafrance Canada
Nadia R. P. W. Hutten Netherlands
Henrik Jungaberle Germany
Theresa M. Carbonaro United States
Lisa Evans United States
Daniel Perkins relative to Kim van Oorsouw Netherlands Kim van Oorsouw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kim van Oorsouw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Perkins

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Perkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Perkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Perkins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Perkins

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Perkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Perkins. The network helps show where Daniel Perkins may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Perkins, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Perkins Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Perkins links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2022112
2 2021100
3 202074
4 202260
5 202146
6 202145
7 202136
8 202134
9 202230
10
Beyond Neo-liberalism: The Social Investment State?
200424
11 202021
12 202121
13 200720
14 202319
15 202313
16 202113
17 201013
18 202312
19
Improving Employment Retention and Advancement of Low-paid Workers
200812
20 20019

About Daniel Perkins

Daniel Perkins is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Biological Psychiatry, Nutrition and Dietetics, Pharmacology and Toxicology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 787 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (29 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (17 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (12 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (11 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (7 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (79 citations), Clinical Psychology (598 citations), Toxicology (50 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (242 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (171 citations). Daniel Perkins has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jerome Sarris, Nicole Leite Galvão‐Coelho, Violeta Schubert, José Carlos Bouso, Luís Fernando Tófoli, Emérita Sátiro Opaleye, Justin Sinclair, Simon Ruffell, Wolfgang Marx and Michael de Manincor. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Journal of Psychopharmacology, Frontiers in Pharmacology, The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology and Current Opinion in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026