Daniel Pereda

1.9k citations
65 papers · 500 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Pereda

47 papers receiving 487 citations

Peers

Daniel Pereda
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 323
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 221
  • Emergency Medicine 54
  • Surgery 176
  • Internal Medicine 14
Replace Patrick Odonkor with:
Patrick Odonkor United States
Toshinobu Kazui United States
Yukio Okazaki Japan
Jean Paul Bessou France
Andreas Rukosujew Germany
Mitsunori Kaneko Japan
Ignacio Inglessis‐Azuaje United States
Hiroshi Tomoeda Japan
Fabrizio Sbraga Spain
Michele La Torre Italy
Daniel Pereda relative to Patrick Odonkor United States Patrick Odonkor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Patrick Odonkor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Pereda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Pereda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Pereda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Pereda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Pereda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Pereda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Pereda. The network helps show where Daniel Pereda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Pereda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Pereda Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Pereda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201472
2 201470
3 201169
4 201434
5 201329
6 201919
7 200719
8 201018
9 200818
10 202113
11 201610
12 20159
13 20109
14 20208
15 20218
16 20247
17 20216
18 20126
19 20156
20 20205

About Daniel Pereda

Daniel Pereda is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 65 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (24 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (22 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (13 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (10 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (10 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (8 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (6 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (323 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (221 citations), Emergency Medicine (54 citations), Surgery (176 citations) and Internal Medicine (14 citations). Daniel Pereda has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include John V. Conte, Manuel Castellà, Ana García‐Álvarez, Borja Ibáñez, Valentı́n Fuster, Elena Sandoval, Eduard Quintana, Jaume Agüero, Damián Sánchez‐Quintana and Inés García‐Lunar. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition), Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Journal of Clinical Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact