Daniel Nadolny
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cultural Differences and Values
- Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Papers in
-
- Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports 3
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 1
- Cultural Differences and Values 1
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 3
- Co-authors
- Nadia Bashir (1 shared paper)Penelope Lockwood (1 shared paper)Alison L. Chasteen (1 shared paper)Marina Milyavskaya (3 shared papers)Richard Koestner (2 shared papers)Kerry Kawakami (1 shared paper)Curtis E. Phills (1 shared paper)Michael Inzlicht (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1 paper)Journal of Health Psychology (1 paper)Citizen Science Theory and Practice (1 paper)Personality and Individual Differences (1 paper)European Journal of Social Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Canada
In The Last Decade
Daniel Nadolny
6 papers receiving 292 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Applied Psychology 89
- Social Psychology 134
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 66
- Sociology and Political Science 183
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 39
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Nadolny
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Nadolny's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Nadolny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Nadolny more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Nadolny
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Nadolny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Nadolny. The network helps show where Daniel Nadolny may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Nadolny, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 150 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 5 |
About Daniel Nadolny
Daniel Nadolny is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Ecology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Workplace Health and Well-being (1 paper), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (89 citations), Social Psychology (134 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (66 citations), Sociology and Political Science (183 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (39 citations). Daniel Nadolny has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Nadia Bashir, Penelope Lockwood, Alison L. Chasteen, Marina Milyavskaya, Richard Koestner, Kerry Kawakami, Curtis E. Phills, Michael Inzlicht and Erin E. Fraser. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Health Psychology, Citizen Science Theory and Practice, Personality and Individual Differences and European Journal of Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.