Daniel Lim

897 citations
11 papers · 505 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • International Development and Aid
    • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
    • COVID-19 and Mental Health
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Papers in

Daniel Lim

9 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

Daniel Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Development 62
  • Clinical Psychology 252
  • Applied Psychology 58
  • Social Psychology 147
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 62
Replace Susan Wright with:
Susan Wright United States
Martin Diewald Germany
John L. Washburn
Jia‐Yan Pan Hong Kong
Douglas M. Stenstrom United States
Khalil Shikaki Israel
Michael McCarrey Canada
Nathan D. Martin United States
George R. Bach United States
Tracey Cronin United States
Daniel Lim relative to Susan Wright United States Susan Wright's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.9×
Susan Wright · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Lim. The network helps show where Daniel Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Lim Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2016187
2 2015160
3 201366
4 201734
5 201928
6 201918
7
The economics and politics of 'creativity' in Singapore
20048
8 20123
9 20221
10 20240
11 20250

About Daniel Lim

Daniel Lim is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology and Development, having authored 11 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (5 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (2 papers), International Development and Aid (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Development (62 citations), Clinical Psychology (252 citations), Applied Psychology (58 citations), Social Psychology (147 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (62 citations). Daniel Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and India. Frequent co-authors include David DeSteno, Paul Condon, James Raymond Vreeland, Terence Lee, Roxane Cohen Silver and Michael J. Poulin. Their work appears in journals such as Emotion, Psychological Science, PLoS ONE, Journal of Personality and World Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact