Daniel Lim

880 total citations
11 papers, 497 citations indexed

About

Daniel Lim is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Lim has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 497 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Clinical Psychology, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Daniel Lim's work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (5 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (2 papers). Daniel Lim is often cited by papers focused on Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (5 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (2 papers). Daniel Lim collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and India. Daniel Lim's co-authors include David DeSteno, Paul Condon, James Raymond Vreeland, Terence Lee, Michael J. Poulin and Roxane Cohen Silver and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Science and Journal of Personality.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Lim

9 papers receiving 472 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel Lim United States	7	264	158	121	74	65	11	497
Susan Wright United States	13	395 1.5×	146 0.9×	243 2.0×	59 0.8×	25 0.4×	32	615
Martin Diewald Germany	18	74 0.3×	122 0.8×	498 4.1×	128 1.7×	31 0.5×	93	810
Felicity F. Miao United States	9	89 0.3×	385 2.4×	304 2.5×	91 1.2×	81 1.2×	12	601
Francesca Giovanna Maria Gastaldi Italy	13	236 0.9×	150 0.9×	145 1.2×	52 0.7×	35 0.5×	45	560
Yongyu Guo China	13	172 0.7×	235 1.5×	224 1.9×	139 1.9×	106 1.6×	60	629
Douglas M. Stenstrom United States	10	75 0.3×	266 1.7×	373 3.1×	31 0.4×	118 1.8×	17	517
Michael T. Warren United States	14	231 0.9×	229 1.4×	132 1.1×	71 1.0×	48 0.7×	27	547
Assaad Elia Azzi Belgium	16	126 0.5×	255 1.6×	340 2.8×	26 0.4×	40 0.6×	38	704
Giulia Fuochi Italy	14	183 0.7×	194 1.2×	313 2.6×	62 0.8×	31 0.5×	28	610
Ginés Navarro‐Carrillo Spain	14	117 0.4×	334 2.1×	216 1.8×	48 0.6×	46 0.7×	34	563

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Lim

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Lim

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Lim. The network helps show where Daniel Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Lim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Lim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Lim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Lim. Daniel Lim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Lim, Daniel, et al.. (2025). Effect of Shared Leadership on Change-Oriented Innovative Behavior and Creativity: Through Positive psychological Capital. Journal of Human Resource Management Research. 32(1). 121–143.

2.

Lim, Daniel, et al.. (2024). Investigating the role of adversity and benevolence beliefs in predicting prosociality. Journal of Personality. 93(3). 670–682.

3.

Lim, Daniel & David DeSteno. (2022). Guilt underlies compassion among those who have suffered adversity.. Emotion. 23(3). 613–621. 1 indexed citations

4.

Lim, Daniel & David DeSteno. (2019). Past adversity protects against the numeracy bias in compassion.. Emotion. 20(8). 1344–1356. 18 indexed citations

5.

DeSteno, David, et al.. (2019). The Grateful Don’t Cheat: Gratitude as a Fount of Virtue. Psychological Science. 30(7). 979–988. 28 indexed citations

6.

DeSteno, David, et al.. (2017). Meditation Inhibits Aggressive Responses to Provocations. Mindfulness. 9(4). 1117–1122. 33 indexed citations

7.

Lim, Daniel & David DeSteno. (2016). Suffering and compassion: The links among adverse life experiences, empathy, compassion, and prosocial behavior.. Emotion. 16(2). 175–182. 180 indexed citations

8.

Lim, Daniel, Paul Condon, & David DeSteno. (2015). Mindfulness and Compassion: An Examination of Mechanism and Scalability. PLoS ONE. 10(2). e0118221–e0118221. 158 indexed citations

9.

Lim, Daniel & James Raymond Vreeland. (2013). Regional Organizations and International Politics: Japanese Influence over the Asian Development Bank and the UN Security Council. World Politics. 65(1). 34–72. 67 indexed citations

10.

Lim, Daniel & James Raymond Vreeland. (2012). Regional Organizations and International Politics: Japanese Influence Over the Asian Development Bank and the UN Security Council. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations

11.

Lee, Terence & Daniel Lim. (2004). The economics and politics of 'creativity' in Singapore. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University). 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact