Daniel Lammers

592 citations
57 papers · 320 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Lammers

51 papers receiving 314 citations

Peers

Daniel Lammers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 119
  • Emergency Medicine 185
  • Health Informatics 14
  • Biochemistry 24
  • Surgery 106
Replace Max Marsden with:
Max Marsden United Kingdom
Matthew D. Tadlock United States
Evgeny Solomonov Israel
Thomas B. Coopwood United States
Annalisa Volpi Italy
Rebecca Schroeder United States
Monty Khajanchi India
Anita West United Kingdom
Wietse P. Zuidema Netherlands
Rachelle B. Jonas United States
Daniel Lammers relative to Max Marsden United Kingdom Max Marsden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Max Marsden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Lammers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Lammers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Lammers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Lammers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Lammers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Lammers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Lammers. The network helps show where Daniel Lammers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Lammers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Lammers Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Lammers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202336
2 202019
3 202116
4 202016
5 202313
6 202013
7 202012
8 202312
9 202012
10 202011
11 202111
12 202010
13 20219
14 20218
15 20198
16 20248
17 20198
18 20207
19 20206
20 20216

About Daniel Lammers

Daniel Lammers is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 57 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (30 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (25 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (10 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (10 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (4 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (4 papers) and Disaster Response and Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (119 citations), Emergency Medicine (185 citations), Health Informatics (14 citations), Biochemistry (24 citations) and Surgery (106 citations). Daniel Lammers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Matthew J. Eckert, John B. Holcomb, Jason Bingham, Matthew J. Martin, Jan O. Jansen, Woo S., John D. Horton, Richard Betzold, Joshua Richman and Carly Eckert. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, The American Journal of Surgery, Journal of Surgical Research, Transfusion and The American Surgeon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact