Daniel Klooster

930 citations
13 papers · 732 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Klooster

13 papers receiving 648 citations

Peers

Daniel Klooster
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Global and Planetary Change 465
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 144
  • Business and International Management 31
  • Strategy and Management 165
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 57
Replace Dan Klooster with:
Dan Klooster United States
Roger Alex Clapp Canada
Paul S. Ciccantell United States
Irmeli Mustalahti Finland
A. White Canada
Benno Pokorny Germany
Ousseynou Ndoye Cameroon
Frank Matose South Africa
Émilie Coudel France
James Mayers United Kingdom
Daniel Klooster relative to Dan Klooster United States Dan Klooster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Dan Klooster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Klooster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Klooster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Klooster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Klooster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Klooster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Klooster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Klooster. The network helps show where Daniel Klooster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Klooster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Klooster Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Klooster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2000188
2 2000185
3 200281
4 200581
5 200246
6 199945
7 201825
8 201721
9 200521
10 201316
11 201510
12
Institutional Choice, Community, and Struggle: A Case Study of Forest Co-Management in Mexico
20017
13 20226

About Daniel Klooster

Daniel Klooster is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Global and Planetary Change, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 732 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (8 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (8 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (3 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (1 paper), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (1 paper) and Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (465 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (144 citations), Business and International Management (31 citations), Strategy and Management (165 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (57 citations). Daniel Klooster has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Omar Masera, James P. Robson, Marie‐Christine Renard, Peter Taylor and Tad Mutersbaugh. Their work appears in journals such as Economic Geography, Agriculture and Human Values, Land Degradation and Development, Journal of Rural Studies and Environmental Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact