Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Education top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Communication top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michelle Colder CarrasAdriano SchimmentiJohan EdmanPierre MaurageYasser KhazaalAlexandre HeerenAlex BlaszczynskiJoël Billieux
- Topics
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers)Social Media and Politics (2 papers)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwedenUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther
8 papers receiving 697 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Sociology and Political Science 571
- Education 277
- Clinical Psychology 262
- Applied Psychology 136
- Communication 105
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther. The network helps show where Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther. Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 75 | |
| 3 | How can we conceptualize behavioural addiction without pathologizing common behaviours?breakdown → | 494 |
| 4 | How can we conceptualize behavioral addiction without pathologizing common behaviors | 9 |
| 5 | INTERNET ADDICTION IN PATIENTS WITH SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER | 2 |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 116 | |
| 8 | 8 |
About Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther
Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther is a scholar working on Communication, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 712 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (136 citations), Communication (105 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (571 citations). Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michelle Colder Carras, Adriano Schimmenti, Johan Edman, Pierre Maurage, Yasser Khazaal, Alexandre Heeren, Alex Blaszczynski, Joël Billieux, Antonius J. van Rooij and Barna Konkolÿ Thege. Their work appears in journals such as Addiction, Journal of Adolescent Health and Addictive Behaviors.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.