Philip Tam

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 735 citations indexed

About

Philip Tam is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Tam has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 735 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Communication and 3 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Philip Tam's work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers). Philip Tam is often cited by papers focused on Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers). Philip Tam collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Philip Tam's co-authors include Douglas A. Gentile, Hans‐Jürgen Rumpf, Florian Rehbein, Guilherme Borges, Gallus Bischof, Ran Tao, Daniel Fung, Jeroen S. Lemmens, Nancy M. Petry and Thomas Mößle and has published in prestigious journals such as Addiction, Journal of Behavioral Addictions and Australasian Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Philip Tam

6 papers receiving 703 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

An international consensus for assessing internet gaming disorder using the newDSM‐5 approach

2014 658 citations Nancy M. Petry, Florian Rehbein et al. Addiction profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Philip Tam Australia	5	646	378	214	138	112	7	735
Ángels González Ibáñez United States	4	595 0.9×	347 0.9×	190 0.9×	126 0.9×	100 0.9×	5	684
Matthew Stevens Australia	5	646 1.0×	340 0.9×	241 1.1×	209 1.5×	52 0.5×	15	739
Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther Sweden	6	571 0.9×	277 0.7×	262 1.2×	136 1.0×	105 0.9×	8	712
Satoko Mihara Japan	10	740 1.1×	480 1.3×	238 1.1×	185 1.3×	145 1.3×	13	834
Yuan‐Chien Pan Taiwan	11	512 0.8×	289 0.8×	145 0.7×	128 0.9×	96 0.9×	13	664
Tyrone L. Burleigh Australia	11	477 0.7×	225 0.6×	175 0.8×	127 0.9×	51 0.5×	22	573
Niko Männikkö Finland	13	593 0.9×	365 1.0×	218 1.0×	103 0.7×	84 0.8×	41	762
Dean Kaptsis Australia	7	451 0.7×	285 0.8×	209 1.0×	89 0.6×	86 0.8×	8	564
Giovanni Del Puente Italy	8	445 0.7×	273 0.7×	126 0.6×	86 0.6×	53 0.5×	25	610
Elfrid Krossbakken Norway	7	578 0.9×	264 0.7×	227 1.1×	111 0.8×	68 0.6×	8	751

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Tam

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Tam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Tam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Tam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Tam

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Tam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Tam. The network helps show where Philip Tam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Tam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Tam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Tam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Tam. Philip Tam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

King, Daniel L., Sophia Achab, Susumu Higuchi, et al.. (2022). Gaming disorder and the COVID-19 pandemic: Treatment demand and service delivery challenges. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 11(2). 243–248. 20 indexed citations

2.

Bell, Erica, Philip Tam, Philip Boyce, et al.. (2022). A novel exploration of irritability in adolescent males: A preliminary study. Australasian Psychiatry. 31(3). 258–262.

3.

Tam, Philip. (2016). Problematic Internet use in youth: An outline and overview for health professionals. 2(1). 802. 4 indexed citations

4.

Petry, Nancy M., Florian Rehbein, Douglas A. Gentile, et al.. (2014). An international consensus for assessing internet gaming disorder using the newDSM‐5 approach. Addiction. 109(9). 1399–1406. 658 indexed citations breakdown →

5.

Tam, Philip & Garry Walter. (2013). Problematic internet use in childhood and youth: evolution of a 21^st century affliction. Australasian Psychiatry. 21(6). 533–536. 39 indexed citations

6.

Tam, Philip. (2006). Clinical skills in infant mental health. Australasian Psychiatry. 14(3). 331–331. 11 indexed citations

7.

Tam, Philip. (2002). Psychiatry and the Cinema. Australasian Psychiatry. 10(2). 178–178. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact