Daniel K. Sparacin
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Materials Chemistry
- Polymers and Plastics top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- David C. PaineGregory P. CrawfordDarran R. CairnsSuzanne M. SachsmanLionel C. KimerlingJürgen MichelDavid T. DanielsonMark Beals
- Topics
- Photonic and Optical Devices (9 papers)Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (4 papers)Optical Network Technologies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCosta Rica
In The Last Decade
Daniel K. Sparacin
12 papers receiving 818 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 668
- Biomedical Engineering 384
- Materials Chemistry 285
- Polymers and Plastics 170
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 139
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel K. Sparacin
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel K. Sparacin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel K. Sparacin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel K. Sparacin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel K. Sparacin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel K. Sparacin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel K. Sparacin. The network helps show where Daniel K. Sparacin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel K. Sparacin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel K. Sparacin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel K. Sparacin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel K. Sparacin. Daniel K. Sparacin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 46 | |
| 6 | 74 | |
| 7 | 136 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | Strain-dependent electrical resistance of tin-doped indium oxide on polymer substratesbreakdown → | 531 |
About Daniel K. Sparacin
Daniel K. Sparacin is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 850 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photonic and Optical Devices (9 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (4 papers) and Optical Network Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Polymers and Plastics (170 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (668 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (384 citations). Daniel K. Sparacin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Costa Rica. Frequent co-authors include David C. Paine, Gregory P. Crawford, Darran R. Cairns, Suzanne M. Sachsman, Lionel C. Kimerling, Jürgen Michel, David T. Danielson, Mark Beals, Jing Cheng and Rong Sun. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics and Optics Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.