Daniel J. Larson

33 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Larson
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Gender Studies 44
  • Health 34
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 28
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 12
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 53
Replace J. Michael Menke with:
J. Michael Menke United States
Brynn Adamson United States
David M. Furst United States
Victor E. Ezeugwu Canada
Sigríður Lára Guðmundsdóttir Iceland
Tommaso B. Jannini Italy
Jeffrey C. Steger United States
E. Keith Byrd United States
Marie Ottilie Frenkel Germany
Norbert Grulke Germany
Daniel J. Larson relative to J. Michael Menke United States J. Michael Menke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J. Michael Menke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Larson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Larson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Larson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Larson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Larson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Larson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Larson. The network helps show where Daniel J. Larson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Larson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Larson Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Larson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201345
2 201936
3 202132
4 196730
5 201322
6 201518
7 202117
8 202015
9 201414
10 202012
11 201812
12 20136
13 20206
14 20176
15 20126
16 20195
17 20214
18 20234
19 20194
20 20244

About Daniel J. Larson

Daniel J. Larson is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Gender Studies, having authored 36 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (5 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (4 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (4 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (44 citations), Health (34 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (28 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (12 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (53 citations). Daniel J. Larson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Serbia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Larson, Sarah B. Maness, Lesley J. White, Marshall K. Cheney, William M. Pryor, Kevin K. McCully, Christopher D. Black, James P. Allison, Donald D. Jensen and Joel G. Maxcy. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, International Journal of Sport Finance, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development and Clinical Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact