Daniel J. Freed

1.1k total citations
35 papers, 693 citations indexed

About

Daniel J. Freed is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel J. Freed has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 693 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 8 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Daniel J. Freed's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (11 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (9 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (8 papers). Daniel J. Freed is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (11 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (9 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (8 papers). Daniel J. Freed collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Daniel J. Freed's co-authors include Sigfrid D. Soli, Andrew J. Vermiglio, Laurel M. Fisher, Ivan Pal, Justin M. Aronoff, Mary P. Gillam, Mark E. Molitch, Sunil Puria, Brian C. J. Moore and Michael J. Nilsson and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Ear and Hearing.

In The Last Decade

Daniel J. Freed

28 papers receiving 630 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel J. Freed United States 13 439 274 220 190 67 35 693
Elizabeth Convery Australia 17 589 1.3× 416 1.5× 155 0.7× 169 0.9× 27 0.4× 32 660
David B. Hawkins United States 17 942 2.1× 581 2.1× 349 1.6× 298 1.6× 30 0.4× 55 1.2k
Elmer Owens United States 17 537 1.2× 205 0.7× 183 0.8× 200 1.1× 13 0.2× 34 771
Jerry L. Punch United States 13 415 0.9× 308 1.1× 181 0.8× 125 0.7× 11 0.2× 40 496
Lisa Lucks Mendel United States 12 476 1.1× 282 1.0× 152 0.7× 142 0.7× 7 0.1× 38 670
Michel Picard Canada 7 444 1.0× 327 1.2× 52 0.2× 202 1.1× 17 0.3× 18 598
Tom Frank United States 14 562 1.3× 336 1.2× 295 1.3× 152 0.8× 11 0.2× 46 733
Lawrence L. Feth United States 12 475 1.1× 256 0.9× 164 0.7× 185 1.0× 4 0.1× 65 624
Jana Besser Netherlands 10 555 1.3× 388 1.4× 200 0.9× 85 0.4× 14 0.2× 16 650
H. Gustav Mueller United States 15 672 1.5× 457 1.7× 303 1.4× 202 1.1× 16 0.2× 56 767

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Freed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Freed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Freed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Freed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Freed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Freed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Freed. The network helps show where Daniel J. Freed may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel J. Freed

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel J. Freed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel J. Freed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel J. Freed. Daniel J. Freed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Colee, James, et al.. (2023). How Does Watermelon Grafting Impact Fruit Yield and Quality? A Systematic Review. HortScience. 58(8). 836–845. 6 indexed citations
2.
Vermiglio, Andrew J., Sigfrid D. Soli, Daniel J. Freed, & Xiangming Fang. (2020). The Effect of Stimulus Audibility on the Relationship between Pure-Tone Average and Speech Recognition in Noise Ability. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 31(3). 224–232. 13 indexed citations
3.
Vermiglio, Andrew J., Sigfrid D. Soli, Daniel J. Freed, & Xiangming Fang. (2019). The Effect of Stimulus Audibility on the Relationship between Pure-Tone Average and Speech Recognition in Noise Ability. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 1 indexed citations
4.
Soli, Sigfrid D., Odile Clavier, Daniel J. Freed, et al.. (2018). Evidence-based occupational hearing screening II: validation of a screening methodology using measures of functional hearing ability. International Journal of Audiology. 57(5). 323–334. 10 indexed citations
5.
Freed, Daniel J., et al.. (2015). Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech. Ear and Hearing. 36(5). e214–e224. 69 indexed citations
6.
Vermiglio, Andrew J., Sigfrid D. Soli, Daniel J. Freed, & Laurel M. Fisher. (2012). The Relationship between High-Frequency Pure-Tone Hearing Loss, Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) Thresholds, and the Articulation Index. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 23(10). 779–788. 68 indexed citations
7.
Aronoff, Justin M., Daniel J. Freed, Laurel M. Fisher, Ivan Pal, & Sigfrid D. Soli. (2011). The Effect of Different Cochlear Implant Microphones on Acoustic Hearing Individuals' Binaural Benefits for Speech Perception in Noise. Ear and Hearing. 32(4). 468–484. 36 indexed citations
8.
Puria, Sunil, et al.. (2011). Cues above 4 kilohertz can improve spatially separated speech recognition.. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 129(4_Supplement). 2384–2384. 1 indexed citations
9.
Aronoff, Justin M., et al.. (2010). The use of interaural time and level difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 127(3). EL87–EL92. 98 indexed citations
10.
Freed, Daniel J., et al.. (2008). Evaluation of binaural functions in bilateral cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology. 47(6). 296–310. 48 indexed citations
11.
Freed, Daniel J.. (2008). Adaptive feedback cancellation in hearing aids with clipping in the feedback path. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 123(3). 1618–1626. 30 indexed citations
12.
Freed, Daniel J. & Sigfrid D. Soli. (2006). An Objective Procedure for Evaluation of Adaptive Antifeedback Algorithms in Hearing Aids. Ear and Hearing. 27(4). 382–398. 25 indexed citations
13.
Freed, Daniel J.. (1996). Editor's Observations: Reforming the Commission: Internal Rules and Revised Guidelines. Federal Sentencing Reporter. 9(2). 64–66. 1 indexed citations
14.
Freed, Daniel J. & Marc L. Miller. (1994). Editors' Observations: Guiding the Discretion of U.S. Attorneys: Department of Justice Policies, 1980-1994. Federal Sentencing Reporter. 6(6). 299–301. 2 indexed citations
15.
Miller, Marc L. & Daniel J. Freed. (1993). Editors' Notes. Federal Sentencing Reporter. 6(2). 58–58. 5 indexed citations
16.
Freed, Daniel J.. (1992). Federal Sentencing in the Wake of Guidelines: Unacceptable Limits on the Discretion of Sentencers. The Yale Law Journal. 101(8). 1681–1681. 42 indexed citations
17.
18.
Kendall, Gary S., et al.. (1986). Image Model Reverberation from Recirculating Delays. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 6 indexed citations
19.
Freed, Daniel J. & William L. Martens. (1986). Deriving Psychophysical Relations for Timbre.. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 1986. 4 indexed citations
20.
Freed, Daniel J., et al.. (1980). Standards relating to interim status : the release, control, and detention of accused juvenile offenders between arrest and disposition. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elizabeth Convery Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David B. Hawkins Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elmer Owens Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jerry L. Punch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lisa Lucks Mendel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michel Picard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tom Frank Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lawrence L. Feth Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jana Besser Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by H. Gustav Mueller
Rankless by CCL
2026