Daniel J. Blizzard

1.3k citations
38 papers · 947 indexed · h-index 19

Daniel J. Blizzard

35 papers receiving 924 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Blizzard
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 427
  • Surgery 755
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 67
  • Pharmacology 82
  • Internal Medicine 17
Replace Graham S. Goh with:
Graham S. Goh Singapore
Fatih Dikici Türkiye
Sébastien Pesenti France
Andre Jakoi United States
Alexander Tuchman United States
Kyriakos Papavasiliou Greece
Kai-Ming Fu United States
Christina L. Goldstein United States
Ioannis Gkiatas Greece
Aiden Devitt Ireland
Daniel J. Blizzard relative to Graham S. Goh Singapore Graham S. Goh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Graham S. Goh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Blizzard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Blizzard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Blizzard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Blizzard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Blizzard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Blizzard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Blizzard. The network helps show where Daniel J. Blizzard may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Blizzard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Blizzard Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Blizzard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201812
2 201794
3 201746
4 20163
5 201634
6 201665
7 201610
8 201563
9 201532
10 201522
11 201529
12 201529
13 201519
14
The controversy surrounding bone morphogenetic proteins in the spine: a review of current research.
2014113
15 201436
16 201310
17 20127
18 20126
19 201218
20 20126

About Daniel J. Blizzard

Daniel J. Blizzard is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Internal Medicine and Biochemistry, having authored 38 papers that have together received 947 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (20 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (16 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (10 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (9 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (6 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (5 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (5 papers) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (427 citations), Surgery (755 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (67 citations), Pharmacology (82 citations) and Internal Medicine (17 citations). Daniel J. Blizzard has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joshua W. Hustedt, John A. Thomas, Thorsten M. Seyler, Jonathan N. Grauer, Mitchell R. Klement, Michael P. Bolognesi, Charles Sheets, Chris Brown, Michael Leslie and Michael R. Baumgaertner. Their work appears in journals such as The Spine Journal, Orthopedics, The Journal of Arthroplasty, Spine and Journal of Neurosurgery Spine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026