Daniel Harabor

83 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Daniel Harabor
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1.1k
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 99
  • Signal Processing 261
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 242
  • Software 76
Replace Nathan Sturtevant with:
Nathan Sturtevant Canada
T. K. Satish Kumar United States
Hang Ma United States
Guni Sharon United States
Zheng Sun China
Subhrajit Bhattacharya United States
Eric Schkufza United States
Alban Grastien Australia
Glenn Wagner United States
Hanna Kurniawati Australia
Daniel Harabor relative to Nathan Sturtevant Canada Nathan Sturtevant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nathan Sturtevant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Harabor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Harabor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Harabor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Harabor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Harabor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Harabor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Harabor. The network helps show where Daniel Harabor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Harabor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Harabor Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Harabor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011258
2 2019147
3 2021129
4 201478
5 202163
6 201949
7 202247
8 201947
9 201942
10 201937
11 202036
12 202233
13 201332
14 200832
15 201629
16 202126
17 202123
18 201520
19 201020
20 201720

About Daniel Harabor

Daniel Harabor is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Computer Networks and Communications and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (61 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (32 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (23 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (11 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (10 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (9 papers), Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods (9 papers) and Optimization and Search Problems (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (1.1k citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (99 citations), Signal Processing (261 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (242 citations) and Software (76 citations). Daniel Harabor has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alban Grastien, Peter J. Stuckey, Sven Koenig, Jiaoyang Li, Hang Ma, Adi Botea, Graeme Gange, Zhe Chen, Javier Alonso–Mora and Xiaoshan Bai. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, Artificial Intelligence, Networks, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters and Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact