Daniel Hammett

1.4k citations
52 papers · 753 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Hammett

51 papers receiving 687 citations

Peers

Daniel Hammett
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Urban Studies 93
  • Geography, Planning and Development 67
  • Sociology and Political Science 434
  • Gender Studies 59
  • Demography 68
Replace Mary Gilmartin with:
Mary Gilmartin Ireland
Caroline Knowles United Kingdom
Fernando J. Bosco United States
Jodi Melamed United States
Sara C. Motta Australia
Thomas B. Osborne United States
Zhu Hong China
Sara Kindon New Zealand
Mark Liechty United States
Nicola Ansell United Kingdom
Daniel Hammett relative to Mary Gilmartin Ireland Mary Gilmartin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Mary Gilmartin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hammett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hammett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hammett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hammett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hammett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hammett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hammett. The network helps show where Daniel Hammett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hammett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Hammett Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Hammett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201053
2 201250
3 201646
4 201032
5 201331
6 201330
7 200730
8 200827
9 201026
10 201224
11 201224
12 201024
13 201020
14 200919
15 201119
16 200718
17 201016
18 201316
19 201016
20 202015

About Daniel Hammett

Daniel Hammett is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education, Political Science and International Relations, Geography, Planning and Development and Urban Studies, having authored 52 papers that have together received 753 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Education and Multiculturalism (6 papers), Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (6 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (5 papers), International Development and Aid (4 papers), Rural development and sustainability (4 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (4 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (4 papers) and Urban Planning and Governance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (93 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (67 citations), Sociology and Political Science (434 citations), Gender Studies (59 citations) and Demography (68 citations). Daniel Hammett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lynn A. Staeheli, Jean Grugel, Niamh Shortt, Thomas Molony, Lucy Jackson, Deborah Sporton, Gijsbert Hoogendoorn, Charles Mather, Daniel Vickers and David Marshall. Their work appears in journals such as Political Geography, Area, International Development Planning Review, Geography and South African Geographical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact