Daniel H. Williams
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Sperm and Testicular Function
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Classics top 5%
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Clivе P. Duncan (2 shared papers)Nelson V. Greidanus (2 shared papers)Bassam A. Masri (3 shared papers)Donald S. Garbuz (3 shared papers)Larry I. Lipshultz (7 shared papers)Edward Karpman (5 shared papers)Louis L. Pisters (1 shared paper)Philippe E. Spiess (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Urology (6 papers)Urology (4 papers)Journal of early Christian studies (3 papers)Behavioral Neuroscience (2 papers)The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Daniel H. Williams
61 papers receiving 843 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Reproductive Medicine 144
- Classics 52
- Surgery 451
- Urology 65
- Religious studies 47
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel H. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel H. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel H. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel H. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel H. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel H. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel H. Williams. The network helps show where Daniel H. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel H. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 152 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 114 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 77 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 72 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 51 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 37 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 22 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 21 | |
| 11 | Evaluation of the anxiolytic properties of tetrahydropalmatine, a Corydalis yanhusuo compound, in the male Sprague-Dawley rat. | 2011 | 19 |
| 12 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 16 | Ambrose of Milan and the end of the Nicene-Arian conflicts | 1995 | 15 |
| 17 | 1996 | 15 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 15 | |
| 19 | 1996 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 14 |
About Daniel H. Williams
Daniel H. Williams is a scholar working on Surgery, Classics, Urology, Sociology and Political Science and Rheumatology, having authored 74 papers that have together received 928 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Byzantine Studies and History (10 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (9 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (8 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (6 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (6 papers), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (6 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (6 papers) and Genital Health and Disease (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (144 citations), Classics (52 citations), Surgery (451 citations), Urology (65 citations) and Religious studies (47 citations). Daniel H. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Clivе P. Duncan, Nelson V. Greidanus, Bassam A. Masri, Donald S. Garbuz, Larry I. Lipshultz, Edward Karpman, Louis L. Pisters, Philippe E. Spiess, Daniel W. Gauthier and Max Maizels. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, Urology, Journal of early Christian studies, Behavioral Neuroscience and The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.