Daniel George

438 total citations
8 papers, 309 citations indexed

About

Daniel George is a scholar working on Ecology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel George has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 309 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Ecology, 3 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 3 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Daniel George's work include Avian ecology and behavior (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers) and Mercury impact and mitigation studies (3 papers). Daniel George is often cited by papers focused on Avian ecology and behavior (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers) and Mercury impact and mitigation studies (3 papers). Daniel George collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Daniel George's co-authors include Jesse Grantham, Joseph Brandt, Donald R. Smith, Myra E. Finkelstein, Joe Burnett, Molly E. Church, Daniel F. Doak, James W. Rivers, Susan M. Haig and Kimberly Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Conservation Biology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel George

8 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel George United States	7	209	131	53	39	26	8	309
Joe Burnett United States	5	204 1.0×	171 1.3×	72 1.4×	40 1.0×	35 1.3×	6	325
Jesse Grantham United States	7	238 1.1×	164 1.3×	75 1.4×	51 1.3×	33 1.3×	9	362
Mario León‐Ortega Spain	11	159 0.8×	178 1.4×	74 1.4×	33 0.8×	26 1.0×	25	353
Marcelo Romano Argentina	12	208 1.0×	84 0.6×	54 1.0×	68 1.7×	31 1.2×	26	363
Debbie Pain United Kingdom	7	216 1.0×	88 0.7×	57 1.1×	114 2.9×	75 2.9×	11	368
Anthony Turk United Kingdom	8	222 1.1×	75 0.6×	28 0.5×	33 0.8×	17 0.7×	14	316
Jennifer A. Gervais United States	11	248 1.2×	125 1.0×	48 0.9×	102 2.6×	32 1.2×	20	411
Matthew Johnson United States	10	217 1.0×	50 0.4×	24 0.5×	76 1.9×	61 2.3×	23	321
Kurt K. Burnham United States	10	270 1.3×	250 1.9×	120 2.3×	33 0.8×	33 1.3×	22	528
Mélanie Whiteside Canada	7	113 0.5×	47 0.4×	50 0.9×	44 1.1×	26 1.0×	10	313

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel George

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel George's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel George with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel George more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel George

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel George. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel George. The network helps show where Daniel George may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel George

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel George. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel George based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel George. Daniel George is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Kelly, T. Ross, Bruce A. Rideout, Jesse Grantham, et al.. (2015). Two decades of cumulative impacts to survivorship of endangered California condors in California. Biological Conservation. 191. 391–399. 18 indexed citations

2.

Rivers, James W., et al.. (2014). Resource Selection by the California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus) Relative to Terrestrial-Based Habitats and Meteorological Conditions. PLoS ONE. 9(2). e88430–e88430. 10 indexed citations

3.

Kelly, T. Ross, Jesse Grantham, Daniel George, et al.. (2014). Spatiotemporal Patterns and Risk Factors for Lead Exposure in Endangered California Condors during 15 Years of Reintroduction. Conservation Biology. 28(6). 1721–1730. 27 indexed citations

4.

Rivers, James W., Susan M. Haig, Carl J. Schwarz, et al.. (2014). An analysis of monthly home range size in the critically endangered California CondorGymnogyps californianus. Bird Conservation International. 24(4). 492–504. 23 indexed citations

5.

Kurle, Carolyn M., Myra E. Finkelstein, Kimberly Smith, et al.. (2013). Discrimination Factors for Stable Isotopes of Carbon and Nitrogen in Blood and Feathers from Chicks and Juveniles of the California Condor. Ornithological Applications. 115(3). 492–500. 27 indexed citations

6.

George, Daniel, et al.. (2013). Australian fisheries surveys report 2012 Financial and economic performance of the Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery, the Commonwealth Trawl Sector and the Gillnet, Hook and Trap Sector. 8 indexed citations

7.

George, Daniel, et al.. (2012). Fisheries : Outlook to 2016-17. 2(1). 119. 3 indexed citations

8.

Finkelstein, Myra E., Daniel F. Doak, Daniel George, et al.. (2012). Lead poisoning and the deceptive recovery of the critically endangered California condor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(28). 11449–11454. 193 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact