Daniel G. Schwartz

581 citations
44 papers · 323 indexed · h-index 10

Daniel G. Schwartz

40 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers

Daniel G. Schwartz
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Artificial Intelligence 216
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 81
  • Management Science and Operations Research 60
  • Statistics and Probability 25
  • Software 10
Replace Bernd Reusch with:
Bernd Reusch Germany
Leh Luoh Taiwan
Wen-Xiang Gu China
Sathiya Keerthi United States
Thomas M. Strat United States
Hiroyoshi Nomura Japan
Farnaz Sabahi Iran
L.T. Kóczy Hungary
Andrey Kolobov United States
Daniel G. Schwartz relative to Bernd Reusch Germany Bernd Reusch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bernd Reusch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel G. Schwartz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel G. Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel G. Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel G. Schwartz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel G. Schwartz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel G. Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel G. Schwartz. The network helps show where Daniel G. Schwartz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Daniel G. Schwartz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel G. Schwartz Line = papers co-authored together Daniel G. Schwartz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202210
2 20215
3 20209
4 20181
5 20151
6
Case-oriented alert correlation
20081
7
Application of case-based reasoning to multi-sensor network intrusion detection
20050
8
An XML Distance Measure.
20056
9 20052
10
A MetaData Architecture for Case-Based Reasoning.
20042
11 20041
12 20036
13 20030
14 20030
15 20030
16
Knowledge Engineering for Very Large Decision-analytic Medical Models
199910
17 19956
18 199255
19 199113
20
Outline of a naive semantics for reasoning with qualitative linguistic information
19898

About Daniel G. Schwartz

Daniel G. Schwartz is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 44 papers that have together received 323 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (17 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (13 papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (13 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (8 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (6 papers), Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems (6 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (4 papers) and Network Security and Intrusion Detection (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (216 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (81 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (60 citations). Daniel G. Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Iran. Frequent co-authors include George J. Klir, H. W. Lewis, Marek J. Drużdżel, Ercüment Yılmaz, John Dowling, Hanna Wasyluk, Sadoon Azizi, Agnieszka Oniśko, Andreas Paepcke and Dan E. Tamir. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the IEEE, Information Sciences and Artificial Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026