Daniel G. Pike

25 papers receiving 650 citations

Peers

Daniel G. Pike
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Ecology 359
  • Biological Psychiatry 35
  • Oceanography 144
  • Developmental Biology 25
  • Atmospheric Science 179
Replace Andrew Chih Wei Huang with:
Andrew Chih Wei Huang Taiwan
Søren Bo Andersen Denmark
Amy McKinney United States
Robert R. Parker United Kingdom
Andrew Young United Kingdom
Amandine Sabadel New Zealand
H.H. Dijkstra Netherlands
Samantha M. Reilly United States
Susan Howell United States
G Pilleri Switzerland
Daniel G. Pike relative to Andrew Chih Wei Huang Taiwan Andrew Chih Wei Huang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Andrew Chih Wei Huang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel G. Pike

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel G. Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel G. Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel G. Pike more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel G. Pike

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel G. Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel G. Pike. The network helps show where Daniel G. Pike may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel G. Pike, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel G. Pike Line = papers co-authored together Daniel G. Pike links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004255
2 202358
3 201557
4 200939
5 201339
6 201929
7 199326
8 200925
9 199024
10 200922
11 202020
12 200916
13 202014
14 202014
15 202013
16 201912
17 200910
18 20208
19
Distribution, abundance and trends in abundance of fin and humpback whales in the North Atlantic
20057
20 20096

About Daniel G. Pike

Daniel G. Pike is a scholar working on Ecology, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 711 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine animal studies overview (20 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (12 papers), Marine and fisheries research (8 papers), Underwater Acoustics Research (7 papers), Cephalopods and Marine Biology (3 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper) and CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (359 citations), Biological Psychiatry (35 citations), Oceanography (144 citations), Developmental Biology (25 citations) and Atmospheric Science (179 citations). Daniel G. Pike has collaborated with scholars based in Iceland, Faroe Islands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Þorvaldur Gunnlaugsson, Gísli A. Víkingsson, Tracy Waldeck, Dennis S. Charney, Alexander Neumeister, Omer Bonne, David A. Luckenbaugh, Kristine Erickson, Bjarni Mikkelsen and Geneviève Desportes. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Journal of Affective Disorders, Energy & Environmental Science and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact