Daniel G. Cole

44 total papers · 535 total citations
21 papers, 336 citations indexed

About

Daniel G. Cole is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Anthropology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel G. Cole has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 336 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Geography, Planning and Development, 6 papers in Anthropology and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Daniel G. Cole's work include Geographic Information Systems Studies (7 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers) and Indigenous Studies and Ecology (2 papers). Daniel G. Cole is often cited by papers focused on Geographic Information Systems Studies (7 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers) and Indigenous Studies and Ecology (2 papers). Daniel G. Cole collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Daniel G. Cole's co-authors include Michael G. Pogue, Betty J. Meggers, Richard W. Thorington, Richard P. Vari, Stanley H. Weitzman, W. Ronald Heyer, Daphné Bavelier, Anton Beer, T. Erwin and Jonathan A. Coddington and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Biodiversity and Conservation and ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information.

In The Last Decade

Daniel G. Cole

19 papers receiving 310 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Daniel G. Cole 75 65 61 61 47 21 336
Ruth Weaver 87 1.2× 34 0.5× 32 0.5× 47 0.8× 69 1.5× 13 318
Alfred Russel Wallace 42 0.6× 92 1.4× 18 0.3× 27 0.4× 20 0.4× 42 361
Robert K. Moseley 105 1.4× 55 0.8× 45 0.7× 6 0.1× 142 3.0× 21 359
Ritwik Kulkarni 23 0.3× 23 0.4× 63 1.0× 13 0.2× 65 1.4× 12 312
Derek Corcoran 61 0.8× 84 1.3× 89 1.5× 3 0.0× 84 1.8× 24 322
Richard E. W. Berl 34 0.5× 8 0.1× 18 0.3× 27 0.4× 59 1.3× 22 360
Gail E. Austen 39 0.5× 44 0.7× 79 1.3× 5 0.1× 87 1.9× 15 313
Anita Kar Yan Wan 78 1.0× 20 0.3× 14 0.2× 14 0.2× 34 0.7× 12 345
Daniel Levitis 22 0.3× 79 1.2× 11 0.2× 5 0.1× 30 0.6× 14 389
Rich Williams 80 1.1× 110 1.7× 25 0.4× 3 0.0× 43 0.9× 13 333

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel G. Cole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel G. Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel G. Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel G. Cole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel G. Cole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel G. Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel G. Cole. The network helps show where Daniel G. Cole may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel G. Cole

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel G. Cole. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel G. Cole based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel G. Cole. Daniel G. Cole is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026