Charles S. Carver
- Applied Psychology top 0.01%
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being 61
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 45
- Clinical Psychology top 0.01%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 46
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.01%
- Mental Health Research Topics 42
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 41
- Social Psychology top 0.01%
- General Decision Sciences top 0.1%
-
- Cancer survivorship and care 60
-
- Family Support in Illness 45
-
- Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life 36
Charles S. Carver
369 papers receiving 91.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 211
- Applied Psychology 31.0k
- Clinical Psychology 34.2k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 21.1k
- Social Psychology 32.5k
- General Decision Sciences 1.6k
Countries citing papers authored by Charles S. Carver
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles S. Carver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles S. Carver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles S. Carver more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles S. Carver
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles S. Carver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles S. Carver. The network helps show where Charles S. Carver may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles S. Carver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 55 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 50 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 67 | |
| 10 | Two distinct bases of inhibition of behaviour: Viewing biological phenomena through the lens of psychological theory | 2008 | 8 |
| 11 | 2005 | 84 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 199 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 163 | |
| 14 | Influences of personality and coping variables on health behaviors and health outcomes. | 2000 | 1 |
| 15 | Perspectives on behavioral self-regulation | 1999 | 36 |
| 16 | 1999 | 76 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 84 | |
| 18 | You want to measure coping but your protocol’ too long: Consider the brief copebreakdown → | 1997 | 5432 |
| 19 | 1987 | 91 | |
| 20 | Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.breakdown → | 1985 | 3817 |
About Charles S. Carver
Charles S. Carver is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Psychology, having authored 378 papers that have together received 98.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (61 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (60 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (46 papers), Family Support in Illness (45 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (45 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (42 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (41 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (36 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (31.0k citations), Clinical Psychology (34.2k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (21.1k citations). Charles S. Carver has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Michael F. Scheier, Michael W. Bridges, Teri L. White, Michael H. Antoni, Sheri L. Johnson, Jennifer K. Connor-Smith, Eddie Harmon‐Jones, Suzanne C. Segerstrom, Youngmee Kim and Richard Schulz.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.