Daniel Emery

20 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

Experimental evidence for the functional relevance of anion–π interactions 2010 · 431 citations
4310+5+10Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Daniel Emery
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 616
  • Spectroscopy 721
  • Organic Chemistry 832
  • Inorganic Chemistry 284
  • Biomaterials 204
Replace Oliver Dumele∞ with:
Oliver Dumele∞ Germany
Stefan Matile Switzerland
Carmen Rotger Spain
Ulrich Lüning Germany
Myroslav O. Vysotsky Germany
Maija Nissinen Finland
Teruo Shinmyozu Japan
Hirohiko Houjou Japan
Lakshmi S. Kaanumalle United States
Roberta Cacciapaglia Italy
Daniel Emery relative to Oliver Dumele∞ Germany Oliver Dumele∞'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Oliver Dumele∞ · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Emery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Emery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Emery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Emery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Emery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Emery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Emery. The network helps show where Daniel Emery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Emery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Emery Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Emery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Experimental evidence for the functional relevance of anion–π interactions
Hit paper breakdown →
2010431
2 2012231
3 2011221
4 2013174
5 2011136
6 2009115
7 2010100
8 201099
9 201169
10 201356
11 201755
12 201142
13 201040
14 201124
15 200915
16 201011
17 197611
18 20139
19 20243
20 20131

About Daniel Emery

Daniel Emery is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Molecular Biology and Materials Chemistry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystallography and molecular interactions (8 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (7 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers), Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (4 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (3 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (2 papers) and Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (616 citations), Spectroscopy (721 citations), Organic Chemistry (832 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (284 citations) and Biomaterials (204 citations). Daniel Emery has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jiri Mareda, Stefan Matile, Naomi Sakai, Andreas Vargas Jentzsch, Giuseppe Resnati, Pierangelo Metrangolo, Stefan Matile, Shinichiro Sakurai, Toshihide Takeuchi and Christoph A. Schalley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemistry - A European Journal, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Pest Management Science and Nature Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact