Daniel Elíes

792 citations
30 papers · 533 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Elíes

29 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Daniel Elíes
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Ophthalmology 416
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 497
  • Epidemiology 114
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 95
  • Developmental Biology 1
Replace Gianni Petrocelli with:
Gianni Petrocelli Italy
Achim Langenbucher Germany
Osamu Hieda Japan
Kátia Mantovani Bottós Brazil
Eui Sang Chung South Korea
Hugo van Cleynenbreugel Netherlands
Rajan Bhojwani United Kingdom
Jiaonan Ma China
Anıl Kubaloğlu Türkiye
Wiwan Sansanayudh Canada
Daniel Elíes relative to Gianni Petrocelli Italy Gianni Petrocelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Gianni Petrocelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Elíes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Elíes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Elíes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Elíes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Elíes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Elíes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Elíes. The network helps show where Daniel Elíes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Elíes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Elíes Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Elíes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201587
2 201453
3 201350
4 201241
5 200540
6 201530
7 202123
8 200417
9 201014
10 200414
11 201614
12 202014
13 201414
14 201114
15 201013
16 201612
17 201011
18 201211
19 201410
20 202010

About Daniel Elíes

Daniel Elíes is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Molecular Biology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 533 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (26 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (15 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (15 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (10 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (8 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (7 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (2 papers) and Retinal and Macular Surgery (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (416 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (497 citations), Epidemiology (114 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (95 citations) and Developmental Biology (1 citation). Daniel Elíes has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include José L. Güell, Óscar Gris, Felicidad Manero, Mercè Morral, Paula Verdaguer, Glòria Mateu‐Figueras, José Garcia-Arumı́, Anna Boixadera, François Malecaze and Nuno Moura‐Coelho. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Cornea, Journal of Refractive Surgery, Clinical ophthalmology and Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact