Daniel DeMoss
Impact in
-
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Nephrology top 10%
- Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Bone health and osteoporosis research 6
-
- Birth, Development, and Health 3
- Co-authors
- Gary L. Wright (5 shared papers)Khurram Nasir (2 shared papers)Matthew J. Budoff (2 shared papers)John E. Hokanson (1 shared paper)Leslee J. Shaw (1 shared paper)David Z. Chow (1 shared paper)Vahid Nabavi (1 shared paper)Daniel S. Berman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Life Sciences (2 papers)Calcified Tissue International (2 papers)Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology (1 paper)Metabolism (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Hypertension (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Daniel DeMoss
8 papers receiving 440 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 237
- Nephrology 60
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 184
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 52
- Surgery 116
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel DeMoss
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel DeMoss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel DeMoss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel DeMoss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel DeMoss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel DeMoss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel DeMoss. The network helps show where Daniel DeMoss may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Daniel DeMoss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 345 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 26 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 21 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 4 |
About Daniel DeMoss
Daniel DeMoss is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Physiology, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 449 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone health and osteoporosis research (6 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (3 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (2 papers), Bone Metabolism and Diseases (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (1 paper), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (1 paper) and Diet and metabolism studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (237 citations), Nephrology (60 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (184 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (52 citations) and Surgery (116 citations). Daniel DeMoss has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Gary L. Wright, Khurram Nasir, Matthew J. Budoff, John E. Hokanson, Leslee J. Shaw, David Z. Chow, Vahid Nabavi, Daniel S. Berman, Gregory L. Kinney and Vivek Nuguri. Their work appears in journals such as Life Sciences, Calcified Tissue International, Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, Metabolism and Journal of Clinical Hypertension.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.