Daniel Deimel
Impact in
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Papers in
-
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology 5
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 4
-
- HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk 8
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes 3
- Co-authors
- Dirk Sander (5 shared papers)Heino Stöver (7 shared papers)Thorsten Köhler (4 shared papers)Norbert Scherbaum (9 shared papers)Henrike Schecke (6 shared papers)Annette Bohn (4 shared papers)Toby Lea (1 shared paper)Christine Firk (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Psychiatry (3 papers)Harm Reduction Journal (3 papers)BMC Psychology (1 paper)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (1 paper)BMC Public Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Daniel Deimel
18 papers receiving 321 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Infectious Diseases 169
- Clinical Psychology 158
- Toxicology 25
- Epidemiology 175
- Social Psychology 94
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Deimel
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Deimel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Deimel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Deimel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Deimel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Deimel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Deimel. The network helps show where Daniel Deimel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Deimel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 86 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 74 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 0 |
About Daniel Deimel
Daniel Deimel is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 24 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (8 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (5 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (5 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (5 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (4 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers) and Health and Medical Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (169 citations), Clinical Psychology (158 citations), Toxicology (25 citations), Epidemiology (175 citations) and Social Psychology (94 citations). Daniel Deimel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Dirk Sander, Heino Stöver, Thorsten Köhler, Norbert Scherbaum, Henrike Schecke, Annette Bohn, Toby Lea, Christine Firk, Thomas Köhler and Tibor M. Brunt. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Harm Reduction Journal, BMC Psychology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and BMC Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.