Daniel de la Iglesia
- Oncology top 5%
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 31
- Surgery top 5%
- Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment 26
- Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments 7
- Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments 6
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances 5
- Genetics top 10%
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease 5
-
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders 6
- Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes 5
- Co-authors
- Julio Iglesias‐GarcíaJ. Enrique Domínguez‐MuñozIria Bastón‐ReyWei HuangRobert SuttonPeter SzatmaryQuentin NunesNicolau Vallejo
- Cited by
- OncologySurgeryGastroenterology
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Daniel de la Iglesia
51 papers receiving 934 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Oncology 486
- Surgery 695
- Gastroenterology 80
- Epidemiology 268
- Genetics 206
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel de la Iglesia
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel de la Iglesia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel de la Iglesia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel de la Iglesia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel de la Iglesia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel de la Iglesia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel de la Iglesia. The network helps show where Daniel de la Iglesia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel de la Iglesia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 60 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 45 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 79 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 38 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 118 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 164 |
About Daniel de la Iglesia
Daniel de la Iglesia is a scholar working on Oncology, Gastroenterology and Surgery, having authored 56 papers that have together received 953 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (31 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (26 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (6 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (6 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (5 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (5 papers) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (486 citations), Surgery (695 citations) and Gastroenterology (80 citations). Daniel de la Iglesia has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Julio Iglesias‐García, J. Enrique Domínguez‐Muñoz, Iria Bastón‐Rey, J. Enrique Domínguez‐Muñoz, Wei Huang, Robert Sutton, Peter Szatmary, Quentin Nunes, Nicolau Vallejo and Rocío Ferreiro‐Iglesias. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Gastroenterology and Gut.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.