Daniel D. McGarry

497 citations
12 papers · 85 · h-index 4

Impact in

  • Classics top 5%
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Byzantine Studies and History
  • History top 10%
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
    • Historical and Religious Studies of Rome

Papers in

    • Medieval Literature and History 3
    • Byzantine Studies and History 1
    • Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 3
    • Historical and Archaeological Studies 2
    • Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books 2

Daniel D. McGarry

8 papers receiving 56 citations

Peers

Daniel D. McGarry
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Classics 33
  • History 20
  • Philosophy 13
  • Anthropology 9
  • Theoretical Computer Science 1
Replace P. J. Jones with:
P. J. Jones United Kingdom
Jean Seznec United Kingdom
Marie-Dominique Chenu
Hans−Werner Goetz Germany
Georges Florovsky
John K. Hale New Zealand
Robert Eno United States
Robert C. Gregg United States
Don Cameron Allen United States
Andrew Marvell
Daniel D. McGarry relative to P. J. Jones United Kingdom P. J. Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
P. J. Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel D. McGarry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel D. McGarry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel D. McGarry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel D. McGarry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel D. McGarry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel D. McGarry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel D. McGarry. The network helps show where Daniel D. McGarry may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1
The metalogicon of John of Salisbury : a twelfth-century defense of the verbal and logical arts of the trivium
195533
2 197527
3 202110
4 195610
5 19582
6 19621
7
Historical Fiction Guide: Annotated Chronological, Geographical, and Topical List of Five Thousand Selected Historical Novels
19631
8 19691
9
The Unconstitutionality of Exclusive Governmental Support of Entirely Secularistic Education
20170
10
Medieval history & civilization
19760
11 19620
12 19580

About Daniel D. McGarry

Daniel D. McGarry is a scholar working on Classics, History, Anthropology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 85 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (3 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (3 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (2 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (2 papers), Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (2 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (1 paper), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper) and Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (33 citations), History (20 citations), Philosophy (13 citations), Anthropology (9 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (1 citation). Daniel D. McGarry has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, The Philosophical Quarterly, Journal of Great Lakes Research, British Journal of Educational Studies and American Documentation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact