Daniel D. McCarthy

950 total citations
33 papers, 551 citations indexed

About

Daniel D. McCarthy is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel D. McCarthy has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 551 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Daniel D. McCarthy's work include Indigenous Studies and Ecology (9 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (5 papers) and Mining and Resource Management (5 papers). Daniel D. McCarthy is often cited by papers focused on Indigenous Studies and Ecology (9 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (5 papers) and Mining and Resource Management (5 papers). Daniel D. McCarthy collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Sweden and United Kingdom. Daniel D. McCarthy's co-authors include Frances Westley, Leonard J. S. Tsuji, Michele‐Lee Moore, Per Olsson, Graham S. Whitelaw, Allison Gates, Michelle Gates, Neil Craik, Rhona M. Hanning and Deborah R. Becker and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychiatric Services, Ecology and Society and Resources Policy.

In The Last Decade

Daniel D. McCarthy

32 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel D. McCarthy Canada 13 141 129 107 93 81 33 551
Jessica Crowe United States 15 96 0.7× 336 2.6× 136 1.3× 49 0.5× 41 0.5× 37 676
Carolyn Whitzman Australia 17 216 1.5× 353 2.7× 83 0.8× 41 0.4× 74 0.9× 70 1.1k
Carlos Larrea Ecuador 10 166 1.2× 168 1.3× 159 1.5× 75 0.8× 74 0.9× 19 797
Patrick Sullivan Australia 14 158 1.1× 109 0.8× 51 0.5× 17 0.2× 32 0.4× 75 661
Paul Lachapelle United States 11 121 0.9× 209 1.6× 246 2.3× 90 1.0× 39 0.5× 30 648
Beth Savan Canada 14 124 0.9× 123 1.0× 40 0.4× 82 0.9× 61 0.8× 26 555
Mary Emery United States 10 281 2.0× 330 2.6× 55 0.5× 46 0.5× 27 0.3× 25 901
Igor Vojnovic United States 21 91 0.6× 266 2.1× 110 1.0× 39 0.4× 123 1.5× 45 978
Dragos Simandan Canada 16 96 0.7× 279 2.2× 47 0.4× 25 0.3× 37 0.5× 32 659
Gerald J. Pruckner Austria 17 143 1.0× 261 2.0× 112 1.0× 86 0.9× 13 0.2× 39 967

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel D. McCarthy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel D. McCarthy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel D. McCarthy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel D. McCarthy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel D. McCarthy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel D. McCarthy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel D. McCarthy. The network helps show where Daniel D. McCarthy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel D. McCarthy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel D. McCarthy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel D. McCarthy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel D. McCarthy. Daniel D. McCarthy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Moore, Michele‐Lee, et al.. (2025). Reflexivity as a transformative capacity for sustainability science: introducing a critical systems approach. Global Sustainability. 8. 6 indexed citations
2.
Haider, L. Jamila, et al.. (2023). Operationalizing ambiguity in sustainability science: embracing the elephant in the room. Sustainability Science. 19(2). 595–614. 8 indexed citations
3.
Craik, Neil, et al.. (2017). Indigenous – corporate private governance and legitimacy: Lessons learned from impact and benefit agreements. Resources Policy. 52. 379–388. 27 indexed citations
4.
Olsson, Per, Michele‐Lee Moore, Frances Westley, & Daniel D. McCarthy. (2017). The concept of the Anthropocene as a game-changer: a new context for social innovation and transformations to sustainability. Ecology and Society. 22(2). 148 indexed citations
5.
McLeod, Fraser, et al.. (2015). Finding Common Ground: A Critical Review of Land Use and Resource Management Policies in Ontario, Canada and their Intersection with First Nations. International Indigenous Policy Journal. 6(1). 11 indexed citations
7.
Whitelaw, Graham S., et al.. (2014). Cultural Protection, Empowerment and Land Use Planning: Identification of Values in Support of Fort Albany First Nation, Ontario, Canada, Community Based Land Use Planning. 34(1). 129. 4 indexed citations
8.
McCarthy, Daniel D., et al.. (2014). A First Nations-led social innovation: a moose, a gold mining company, and a policy window. Ecology and Society. 19(4). 12 indexed citations
9.
McCarthy, Daniel D., et al.. (2014). The Oak Ridges Moraine as a Social Innovation: Strategic Vision as a Social-Ecological Interaction. Ecology and Society. 19(1). 21 indexed citations
10.
Gates, Michelle, Rhona M. Hanning, Allison Gates, Daniel D. McCarthy, & Leonard J. S. Tsuji. (2013). Assessing the Impact of Pilot School Snack Programs on Milk and Alternatives Intake in 2 Remote First Nation Communities in Northern Ontario, Canada. Journal of School Health. 83(2). 69–76. 34 indexed citations
11.
Hori, Yukari, et al.. (2013). The Potential Use of an Interactive Web-based Informatics Tool to Decrease the Incidence of Human-polar Bear Encounters Along the Western James Bay Coast of Ontario, Canada. The International Journal of Technology Knowledge and Society. 8(5). 113–127. 2 indexed citations
12.
Cowan, Donald, et al.. (2012). Dreamcatcher: IT to Support Indigenous People. IT Professional. 14(4). 39–47. 7 indexed citations
13.
Whitelaw, Graham S., et al.. (2011). The controversy of transferring the Class Environmental Assessment process to northern Ontario, Canada: the Victor Mine Power Supply Project. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 29(2). 109–120. 8 indexed citations
14.
McCarthy, Daniel D., et al.. (2011). Indigenous mapping technologies: the past, present and future of the collaborative geomatics web-based tool. 7(3). 340–353. 3 indexed citations
15.
McCarthy, Daniel D., et al.. (2011). A Critical Systems Approach to Social Learning: Building Adaptive Capacity in Social, Ecological, Epistemological (SEE) Systems. Ecology and Society. 16(3). 45 indexed citations
16.
McCarthy, Daniel D.. (2009). A Critical Systems Approach to Socio-Ecological Systems: Implications for social learning and governance. UWSpace (University of Waterloo). 5 indexed citations
17.
McCarthy, Daniel D.. (2003). Post-Normal Governance: An Emerging Counter-Proposal. 7 indexed citations
18.
Becker, Deborah R., Gary R. Bond, Daniel D. McCarthy, et al.. (2001). Converting Day Treatment Centers to Supported Employment Programs in Rhode Island. Psychiatric Services. 52(3). 351–357. 48 indexed citations
19.
Dunleavy, Patrick, et al.. (1999). Government on the Web. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 36(12). 1436–1442. 9 indexed citations
20.
McCarthy, Daniel D., et al.. (1998). Planning a statewide project to convert day treatment to supported employment.. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 22(1). 30–33. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026