Daniel Cuevas-Ramos

518 total citations
7 papers, 387 citations indexed

About

Daniel Cuevas-Ramos is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Cuevas-Ramos has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 387 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 3 papers in Surgery and 1 paper in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Daniel Cuevas-Ramos's work include Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (6 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (6 papers) and Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (3 papers). Daniel Cuevas-Ramos is often cited by papers focused on Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (6 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (6 papers) and Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (3 papers). Daniel Cuevas-Ramos collaborates with scholars based in Mexico, United States and Spain. Daniel Cuevas-Ramos's co-authors include Maria Fleseriu, John D. Carmichael, Odelia Cooper, Adam N. Mamelak, Vivien Bonert, Arkadiusz Gertych, Шломо Мелмед, Dawn Shao Ting Lim, Lesly Portocarrero-Ortíz and Moisés Mercado and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and Journal of Endocrinology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Cuevas-Ramos

7 papers receiving 381 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel Cuevas-Ramos Mexico	6	348	168	97	49	48	7	387
Valter Ângelo Sperling Cescato Brazil	11	276 0.8×	130 0.8×	71 0.7×	84 1.7×	47 1.0×	30	352
Eva C Coopmans Netherlands	11	333 1.0×	173 1.0×	89 0.9×	56 1.1×	24 0.5×	21	357
Vyacheslav Pronin Russia	5	318 0.9×	148 0.9×	112 1.2×	33 0.7×	30 0.6×	19	353
RA Feelders Netherlands	4	339 1.0×	173 1.0×	102 1.1×	35 0.7×	45 0.9×	9	383
Laurent Vroonen Belgium	9	329 0.9×	223 1.3×	56 0.6×	54 1.1×	58 1.2×	21	394
Eigil Husted Nielsen Denmark	9	296 0.9×	102 0.6×	40 0.4×	25 0.5×	47 1.0×	15	322
Craig E Stiles United Kingdom	9	245 0.7×	145 0.9×	47 0.5×	64 1.3×	62 1.3×	12	291
Marcos Manavela Argentina	12	531 1.5×	261 1.6×	70 0.7×	61 1.2×	68 1.4×	26	588
Liliya Rostomyan Belgium	11	254 0.7×	133 0.8×	54 0.6×	62 1.3×	58 1.2×	18	301
Zhi Peng Su China	8	256 0.7×	159 0.9×	81 0.8×	88 1.8×	58 1.2×	10	326

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Cuevas-Ramos

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Cuevas-Ramos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Cuevas-Ramos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Cuevas-Ramos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Cuevas-Ramos

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Cuevas-Ramos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Cuevas-Ramos. The network helps show where Daniel Cuevas-Ramos may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Cuevas-Ramos

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Cuevas-Ramos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Cuevas-Ramos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Cuevas-Ramos. Daniel Cuevas-Ramos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Vargas‐Ortega, Guadalupe, Daniel Cuevas-Ramos, Baldomero González‐Virla, et al.. (2023). Posición del Grupo de Trabajo de Neuroendocrinología respecto a los adenomas de hipófisis no funcionantes. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10(91). 1 indexed citations

2.

Fleseriu, Maria & Daniel Cuevas-Ramos. (2016). Pasireotide: a novel treatment for patients with acromegaly. Drug Design Development and Therapy. 10. 227–227. 36 indexed citations

3.

Cuevas-Ramos, Daniel, Dawn Shao Ting Lim, & Maria Fleseriu. (2016). Update on medical treatment for Cushing’s disease. PubMed. 2(1). 16–16. 30 indexed citations

4.

Portocarrero-Ortíz, Lesly, Maricela Vidrio-Velázquez, Alfredo Reza‐Albarrán, et al.. (2016). The Mexican Acromegaly Registry: Clinical and Biochemical Characteristics at Diagnosis and Therapeutic Outcomes. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 101(11). 3997–4004. 61 indexed citations

5.

Cuevas-Ramos, Daniel & Maria Fleseriu. (2014). Somatostatin receptor ligands and resistance to treatment in pituitary adenomas. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology. 52(3). R223–R240. 125 indexed citations

6.

Cuevas-Ramos, Daniel & Maria Fleseriu. (2014). Treatment of Cushing's disease: a mechanistic update. Journal of Endocrinology. 223(2). R19–R39. 42 indexed citations

7.

Cuevas-Ramos, Daniel, John D. Carmichael, Odelia Cooper, et al.. (2014). A Structural and Functional Acromegaly Classification. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 100(1). 122–131. 92 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact