Daniel Clayton
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 1%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Demography top 10%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Tina LooSatish KumarTrevor J. BarnesCharles R. WarrenStephanie SchnurrMichael E. HarkinDouglas C. TozerNamrata Shrestha
- Topics
- Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (13 papers)Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (7 papers)Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaProgress in Human GeographyTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Daniel Clayton
37 papers receiving 327 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Sociology and Political Science 172
- Geography, Planning and Development 169
- Anthropology 84
- Demography 44
- History and Philosophy of Science 39
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Clayton
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Clayton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Clayton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Clayton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Clayton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Clayton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Clayton. The network helps show where Daniel Clayton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Clayton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Clayton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Clayton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Clayton. Daniel Clayton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | Getting to the Truth: Hemingway, Cather, and the Testimony of Two World Wars | 1 |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | Governance leaders' top issues: audits, physician oversight. | 1 |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | Captain Cook: Explorations and Reassessments | 1 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Daniel Clayton
Daniel Clayton is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Anthropology and Demography, having authored 44 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Geography and Geographical Thought (13 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (7 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (169 citations), Anthropology (84 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (39 citations). Daniel Clayton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tina Loo, Satish Kumar, Trevor J. Barnes, Charles R. Warren, Stephanie Schnurr, Michael E. Harkin, Douglas C. Tozer, Namrata Shrestha, Robert McDonald and Stuart Murray. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Progress in Human Geography and Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.