Daniel C. Baker

83 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Daniel C. Baker
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Dermatology 946
  • Neurology 979
  • Otorhinolaryngology 255
  • Surgery 1.5k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 211
Replace David W. Furnas with:
David W. Furnas United States
Luis O. Vásconez United States
Oded Nahlieli Israel
K.F. Moos United Kingdom
David T. Netscher United States
John A. Girotto United States
Edwin F. Williams United States
Reed O. Dingman United States
Frank W. Masters United States
KENNETH PICKRELL United States
Daniel C. Baker relative to David W. Furnas United States David W. Furnas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
David W. Furnas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Baker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Baker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Baker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Baker. The network helps show where Daniel C. Baker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel C. Baker Line = papers co-authored together Daniel C. Baker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979219
2 1979196
3 1997111
4 2001102
5 197999
6 200587
7 198379
8 198275
9 200374
10 198374
11 200852
12 197751
13 197943
14 197340
15 200136
16
How reliable is self-testing for gonorrhea and chlamydia among men who have sex with men?
201335
17 200933
18 198131
19 195430
20 201930

About Daniel C. Baker

Daniel C. Baker is a scholar working on Dermatology, Otorhinolaryngology, Surgery, Neurology and Anatomy, having authored 89 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (21 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (16 papers), Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research (15 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (12 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (11 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (6 papers) and Voice and Speech Disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (946 citations), Neurology (979 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (255 citations), Surgery (1.5k citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (211 citations). Daniel C. Baker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include John Conley, Ernest S. Chiu, William W. Shaw, John Marquis Converse, Joseph G. McCarthy, Thomas D. Rees, Sumner A. Slavin, Byron Smith, Richard D. Lisman and Sherrell J. Aston. Their work appears in journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology, The Laryngoscope, Clinics in Plastic Surgery and Annals of Plastic Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026