Daniel Brook

464 total citations
21 papers, 245 citations indexed

About

Daniel Brook is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Brook has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 245 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 8 papers in General Health Professions and 7 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Daniel Brook's work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (10 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (5 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers). Daniel Brook is often cited by papers focused on Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (10 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (5 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers). Daniel Brook collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Daniel Brook's co-authors include Vivian F. Go, William C. Miller, Kathryn E. Lancaster, Dyfrig Hughes, Elin Haf Davies, Deena J. Chisolm, Mary Applegate, Kelly J. Kelleher, Berkeley Franz and Lindsay Y. Dhanani and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Medical Care and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Brook

17 papers receiving 238 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel Brook United States	7	110	86	81	46	39	21	245
Sandra M. Travasso India	7	45 0.4×	53 0.6×	83 1.0×	29 0.6×	21 0.5×	10	258
Siyu Zou China	9	37 0.3×	54 0.6×	48 0.6×	21 0.5×	43 1.1×	45	243
Jonathan Zhang United States	9	97 0.9×	41 0.5×	61 0.8×	36 0.8×	10 0.3×	24	226
Ferenc Vincze Hungary	11	60 0.5×	27 0.3×	125 1.5×	24 0.5×	15 0.4×	39	260
Pia Petersson Sweden	11	64 0.6×	45 0.5×	179 2.2×	10 0.2×	22 0.6×	27	296
Olivia K. Sugarman United States	10	93 0.8×	62 0.7×	51 0.6×	9 0.2×	33 0.8×	31	235
Rachel S. Gruver United States	7	61 0.6×	39 0.5×	105 1.3×	23 0.5×	15 0.4×	13	199
Shannon N. Ogden United States	11	124 1.1×	125 1.5×	66 0.8×	6 0.1×	34 0.9×	20	331
Christiane Borges do Nascimento Chofakian Brazil	9	144 1.3×	34 0.4×	152 1.9×	13 0.3×	119 3.1×	25	290
Seok Won Jin United States	10	99 0.9×	74 0.9×	135 1.7×	12 0.3×	14 0.4×	24	345

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Brook

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Brook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Brook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Brook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Brook

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Brook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Brook. The network helps show where Daniel Brook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Brook

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Brook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Brook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Brook. Daniel Brook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Franz, Berkeley, et al.. (2025). Different forms of stigma and rural primary care professionals' willingness to prescribe buprenorphine. Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment. 171. 209633–209633. 2 indexed citations

King, Katherine, Daniel Brook, Vivian F. Go, et al.. (2024). The Implementation Climate for Integrating Buprenorphine Prescribing into Rural Primary Care. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 40(12). 2879–2889. 2 indexed citations

Dhanani, Lindsay Y., Daniel Brook, O. Hall, et al.. (2024). Knowledge of medications for opioid use disorder and associated stigma among primary care professionals. Annals of Medicine. 56(1). 2399316–2399316. 2 indexed citations

Franz, Berkeley, Lindsay Y. Dhanani, O. Hall, et al.. (2024). Buprenorphine misinformation and willingness to treat patients with opioid use disorder among primary care-aligned health care professionals. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice. 19(1). 7–7. 3 indexed citations

Kline, David, William C. Miller, Judith Feinberg, et al.. (2024). Differences in hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing and treatment by opioid, stimulant, and polysubstance use among people who use drugs in rural U.S. communities. Harm Reduction Journal. 21(1). 214–214.

Stopka, Thomas J., Bridget M. Whitney, Daniel Brook, et al.. (2024). Medicaid Policy and Hepatitis C Treatment Among Rural People Who Use Drugs. Medical Care. 63(2). 77–88.

Franz, Berkeley, Lindsay Y. Dhanani, O. Hall, et al.. (2023). Differences in buprenorphine prescribing readiness among primary care professionals with and without X-waiver training in the US. Harm Reduction Journal. 20(1). 180–180. 3 indexed citations

Dhanani, Lindsay Y., William C. Miller, O. Hall, et al.. (2023). Positive contact and empathy as predictors of primary care providers’ willingness to prescribe medications for opioid use disorder. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4. 100263–100263. 3 indexed citations

Brook, Daniel, et al.. (2021). The Relationship Between Hepatitis C Virus Rates and Office-Based Buprenorphine Access in Ohio. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 8(6). ofab242–ofab242.

10.

Franz, Berkeley, Lindsay Y. Dhanani, & Daniel Brook. (2021). Physician blame and vulnerability: novel predictors of physician willingness to work with patients who misuse opioids. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice. 16(1). 33–33. 9 indexed citations

11.

Brook, Daniel, et al.. (2020). “I Was Raised in Addiction”: Constructions of the Self and the Other in Discourses of Addiction and Recovery. Qualitative Health Research. 30(14). 2278–2290. 23 indexed citations

12.

Brook, Daniel, et al.. (2020). “You are not clean until you're not on anything”: Perceptions of medication-assisted treatment in rural Appalachia. International Journal of Drug Policy. 85. 102704–102704. 83 indexed citations

13.

Smooth, Wendy G., et al.. (2020). Access to single-visit IUD insertion at obstetrician-gynecology practices in Ohio: An audit study. Contraception. 102(3). 190–194. 5 indexed citations

14.

Chisolm, Deena J., Daniel Brook, Mary Applegate, & Kelly J. Kelleher. (2019). Social determinants of health priorities of state Medicaid programs. BMC Health Services Research. 19(1). 167–167. 32 indexed citations

15.

Davies, Elin Haf, et al.. (2017). Affordable orphan drugs: a role for not‐for‐profit organizations. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 83(7). 1595–1601. 34 indexed citations

16.

Brook, Daniel. (2014). History of the Present: Yangon. Places. 1 indexed citations

17.

Brook, Daniel. (2013). Head of the Dragon: The Rise of New Shanghai. Places. 1 indexed citations

18.

Brook, Daniel. (2001). The Continuum of Collective Action. Peace Review. 13(2). 265–271.

19.

Brook, Daniel. (1998). Environmental Genocide:. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 57(1). 105–113. 30 indexed citations

20.

Brook, Daniel. (1997). ON NON-VERBAL REPRESENTATION. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 37(3). 232–245. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact