Daniel Böhmer

44 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

Daniel Böhmer
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Genetics 79
  • Urology 29
  • Clinical Biochemistry 27
  • Rheumatology 55
  • Biomaterials 44
Replace Shin Iinuma with:
Shin Iinuma Japan
Satya S. Varanasi United Kingdom
Ji Kwon Park South Korea
Murad Alahdal China
Razieh Karamzadeh Iran
Hai Thanh Pham Japan
Shima Gholizadeh Netherlands
Satoshi Inoue Japan
H. Notbohm Germany
Simona Bolamperti Italy
Daniel Böhmer relative to Shin Iinuma Japan Shin Iinuma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Shin Iinuma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Böhmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Böhmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Böhmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Böhmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Böhmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Böhmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Böhmer. The network helps show where Daniel Böhmer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Böhmer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Böhmer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Böhmer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201151
2 200944
3 201330
4 201925
5 200822
6 202221
7 201920
8 201519
9
Options for artificial nutrition of cancer patients.
199819
10 201818
11 201317
12 201611
13 201811
14 201111
15 201510
16 20109
17 20068
18 20017
19 20017
20 20217

About Daniel Böhmer

Daniel Böhmer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Clinical Biochemistry, Genetics and Cancer Research, having authored 46 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mesenchymal stem cell research (5 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (5 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (4 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (4 papers), Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments (4 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (4 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers) and Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (79 citations), Urology (29 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (27 citations), Rheumatology (55 citations) and Biomaterials (44 citations). Daniel Böhmer has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, Singapore and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ľuboš Danišovič, Ivan Varga, Štefan Polák, Radoslav Zamborský, J Vojtaššák, Vanda Repiská, Helena Gbelcová, Zuzana Varchulová Nováková, Stanislav Žiaran and Tomáš Ruml. Their work appears in journals such as Physiological Research, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, European Journal of Pharmacology, Experimental Biology and Medicine and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact