Daniel Baum

3.2k citations
91 papers · 1.9k indexed · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Baum

83 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Daniel Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 477
  • Structural Biology 122
  • Biophysics 144
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 508
  • Aging 28
Replace Hans‐Christian Hege with:
Hans‐Christian Hege Germany
Steffen Prohaska Germany
Ellen C. Hildreth United States
Hideo Yokota Japan
Carsten Haubold Germany
Anthony Santella United States
Kemal Eren Türkiye
Jonathan M. Taylor United Kingdom
O. Kübler Switzerland
Philippe Andrey France
Daniel Baum relative to Hans‐Christian Hege Germany Hans‐Christian Hege's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Hans‐Christian Hege · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Baum. The network helps show where Daniel Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Baum Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20250
4 20240
5 20240
6 20232
7 20232
8 20234
9 20222
10 202286
11 20224
12 20222
13 202110
14 20218
15 2020149
16 201818
17
Phonetic duration of nouns depends on de-lexicalized syntactic distributions: Evidence from naturally occurring conversation.
20181
18 20177
19 201546
20 2011158

About Daniel Baum

Daniel Baum is a scholar working on Structural Biology, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Biophysics, Paleontology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (15 papers), Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (7 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (7 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (6 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (6 papers), Cephalopods and Marine Biology (5 papers) and Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (477 citations), Structural Biology (122 citations), Biophysics (144 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (508 citations) and Aging (28 citations). Daniel Baum has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Hans‐Christian Hege, James M. Winget, Norbert Lindow, Steffen Prohaska, Holly Rushmeier, Britta Weber, Jürgen Titschack, Thomas Müller‐Reichert, Stephen Mann and Kevin P. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Graphics Forum, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Journal of Structural Biology, PLoS ONE and Zoomorphology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026