Daniel Bacher

3.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
11 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Daniel Bacher is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Bacher has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 6 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Daniel Bacher's work include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (8 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (5 papers). Daniel Bacher is often cited by papers focused on EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (8 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (5 papers). Daniel Bacher collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Daniel Bacher's co-authors include Leigh R. Hochberg, Sydney S. Cash, John P. Donoghue, John D. Simeral, Nicolas Y. Masse, Beata Jarosiewicz, Jörn Vogel, Sami Haddadin, Patrick van der Smagt and Jie Liu and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of Neurophysiology and Science Translational Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Bacher

11 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neural... 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 500 1000 1.5k

Peers

Daniel Bacher
Beata Jarosiewicz United States
John E. Downey United States
Jörn Vogel Germany
Maryam Saleh United States
Joseph E. O’Doherty United States
Brian Wodlinger United States
Francis R. Willett United States
Stephen I. Ryu United States
Beata Jarosiewicz United States
Daniel Bacher
Citations per year, relative to Daniel Bacher Daniel Bacher (= 1×) peers Beata Jarosiewicz

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bacher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bacher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bacher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bacher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bacher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bacher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bacher. The network helps show where Daniel Bacher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Bacher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Bacher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Bacher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Bacher. Daniel Bacher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Traverso, Giovanni, Victor Finomore, James J. Mahoney, et al.. (2023). First-in-human trial of an ingestible vitals-monitoring pill. Device. 1(5). 100125–100125. 12 indexed citations
2.
Milekovic, Tomislav, Daniel Bacher, Anish A. Sarma, et al.. (2019). Volitional control of single-electrode high gamma local field potentials by people with paralysis. Journal of Neurophysiology. 121(4). 1428–1450. 11 indexed citations
3.
Milekovic, Tomislav, Anish A. Sarma, Daniel Bacher, et al.. (2018). Stable long-term BCI-enabled communication in ALS and locked-in syndrome using LFP signals. Journal of Neurophysiology. 120(1). 343–360. 85 indexed citations
4.
Masse, Nicolas Y., Beata Jarosiewicz, John D. Simeral, et al.. (2015). Reprint of “Non-causal spike filtering improves decoding of movement intention for intracortical BCIs”. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 244. 94–103. 5 indexed citations
5.
Vogel, Jörn, Sami Haddadin, Beata Jarosiewicz, et al.. (2015). An assistive decision-and-control architecture for force-sensitive hand–arm systems driven by human–machine interfaces. The International Journal of Robotics Research. 34(6). 763–780. 40 indexed citations
6.
Jarosiewicz, Beata, Anish A. Sarma, Daniel Bacher, et al.. (2015). Virtual typing by people with tetraplegia using a self-calibrating intracortical brain-computer interface. Science Translational Medicine. 7(313). 313ra179–313ra179. 236 indexed citations
7.
Bacher, Daniel, Beata Jarosiewicz, Nicolas Y. Masse, et al.. (2014). Neural Point-and-Click Communication by a Person With Incomplete Locked-In Syndrome. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 29(5). 462–471. 86 indexed citations
8.
Masse, Nicolas Y., Beata Jarosiewicz, John D. Simeral, et al.. (2014). Non-causal spike filtering improves decoding of movement intention for intracortical BCIs. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 236. 58–67. 27 indexed citations
9.
Jarosiewicz, Beata, Nicolas Y. Masse, Daniel Bacher, et al.. (2013). Advantages of closed-loop calibration in intracortical brain–computer interfaces for people with tetraplegia. Journal of Neural Engineering. 10(4). 46012–46012. 73 indexed citations
10.
Hochberg, Leigh R., Daniel Bacher, Beata Jarosiewicz, et al.. (2012). Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature. 485(7398). 372–375. 1768 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Tringale, Kathryn R., Daniel Bacher, & Leigh R. Hochberg. (2012). Towards the optimal design of an assistive communication interface with neural input. 2007. 197–198. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026