Daniel Amen

2.4k citations
68 papers · 1.7k indexed · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Amen

63 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Daniel Amen
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 543
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 419
  • Biological Psychiatry 56
  • Neurology 327
  • Clinical Psychology 393
Replace Michael David Horner with:
Michael David Horner United States
Allison R. Kaup United States
Rosemary Fama United States
Michael N. Dretsch United States
Ginette Lafleche United States
Simon Fleminger United Kingdom
Sina Aslan United States
Guerry M. Peavy United States
Lyle E. Baade United States
Alessandra Canuto Switzerland
Daniel Amen relative to Michael David Horner United States Michael David Horner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michael David Horner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Amen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Amen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Amen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Amen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Amen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Amen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Amen. The network helps show where Daniel Amen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Amen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Amen Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Amen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011179
2 2011116
3 1996116
4 199798
5 199786
6 200578
7 201074
8 201473
9 201170
10 201166
11 201154
12 200953
13 199848
14 200946
15 201141
16 201640
17 198839
18 201237
19 201536
20 202030

About Daniel Amen

Daniel Amen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Epidemiology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (17 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (14 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (14 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (11 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (5 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (543 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (419 citations), Biological Psychiatry (56 citations), Neurology (327 citations) and Clinical Psychology (393 citations). Daniel Amen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Kristen Willeumier, Derek V. Taylor, Andrew B. Newberg, Chris Hanks, Cyrus A. Raji, Joseph C. Wu, Ronald A. Thisted, Dharma Singh Khalsa, Theodore A. Henderson and Somayeh Meysami. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Annals of Clinical Psychiatry and Journal of Neuropsychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact