Daniel A. Hofmaenner

38 papers receiving 517 citations

Peers

Daniel A. Hofmaenner
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 90
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 33
  • Health Informatics 15
  • Infectious Diseases 158
  • Neurology 79
Replace Eugenio Garofalo with:
Eugenio Garofalo Italy
Michael Dommasch Germany
Noriyuki Hattori Japan
Shinn‐Jye Liang Taiwan
Céline Monard France
Giuseppe Papia Canada
Christina Yen United States
Yalım Dikmen Türkiye
Susanne Weber Germany
Peter Reimnitz Germany
Daniel A. Hofmaenner relative to Eugenio Garofalo Italy Eugenio Garofalo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Eugenio Garofalo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel A. Hofmaenner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel A. Hofmaenner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel A. Hofmaenner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel A. Hofmaenner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel A. Hofmaenner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel A. Hofmaenner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel A. Hofmaenner. The network helps show where Daniel A. Hofmaenner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel A. Hofmaenner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel A. Hofmaenner Line = papers co-authored together Daniel A. Hofmaenner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202169
2 202156
3 202141
4 202240
5 202325
6 202124
7 202223
8 202222
9 202321
10 202020
11 202219
12 202219
13 202018
14 202114
15 202110
16 202210
17 20229
18 20218
19 20227
20 20227

About Daniel A. Hofmaenner

Daniel A. Hofmaenner is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery, Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 42 papers that have together received 525 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (8 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (7 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (6 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (4 papers), Thermal Regulation in Medicine (4 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (4 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (90 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (33 citations), Health Informatics (15 citations), Infectious Diseases (158 citations) and Neurology (79 citations). Daniel A. Hofmaenner has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Reto A. Schuepbach, Philipp K. Buehler, Mervyn Singer, Pedro David Wendel‐Garcia, Silvio D. Brugger, Anna Kleyman, Michael Bauer, Adrian T. Press, Claudio Acevedo and Annelies S. Zinkernagel. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care, Frontiers in Medicine, Burns, Intensive Care Medicine Experimental and Intensive Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact